To what Aditya has answered: --keep option is probably not the
solution to what Oliver wants to achieve. I suspect that he indeed
wants to delete obsolete files, but preserve .svn.
Yep. (Although I'm not quite sure what --keep exactly does here.)
Oliver
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
To what Aditya has answered: --keep option is probably not the
solution to what Oliver wants to achieve. I suspect that he indeed
wants to delete obsolete files, but preserve .svn.
Yep. (Although I'm not quite sure what --keep exactly does here.)
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 17:03, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi folks,
what I would like to do is updating a minimal context tree which is under
svn version control ... the problem with the current setup is that
mtxrun mtx-update.lua
deletes all .svn subdirectories in the destination
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi folks,
what I would like to do is updating a minimal context tree which is
under svn version control ... the problem with the current setup is that
mtxrun mtx-update.lua
deletes all .svn subdirectories in the destination directories it
touches for
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
This needs to be fixed by Hans, but my preference would probably be to
fix the behaviour for the other hardcoded delete flag. Exactly because
there might pop up other users wanting to ignore their git, mercurial,
darcs, ... files. And it would make sense to document that
