Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Hi Mojca,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:24:02 -0600, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dvipdfmx
What is with dvipdfmx? Wasn't that one for aleph (which is not in the
minimals any more)?
dvipdfmx is still important in the cjk community, and in any case it's
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
also pdfinfo, pdftops, pdfimages ... everything from xpdf
Hmmm ... apparently that one is only needed for windows, or to be put
in other words: there is no binary in texlive for other platforms.
Apparently I got it with fink. It might be nice to have it for other
Martin Schröder wrote:
2007/9/19, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/19/07, Hans Hagen wrote:
also pdfinfo, pdftops, pdfimages ... everything from xpdf
Hmmm ... apparently that one is only needed for windows, or to be put
in other words: there is no binary in texlive for other platforms.
Hans Hagen wrote:
dvips
Dvips needs a bunch of postscript header (.pro) files, that are
not in the distro right now, I think. When I tried to run it just
now, it was complaining about missing stuff.
so we can go pdf and use pdftops if someone wants proper postscript
That would be fine
Hans Hagen wrote:
well, i'm sure that martin can integrate it into the build; would save a
lot of hassle with binary updates (no problem for tex live since the
polish dropped their translated pool files long ago)
Last time, there were quite a few political/sentimental objections, and
I
Martin Schröder wrote:
2007/9/19, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
mktexmf
^ probably not, not sure what it does
man mktexmf
mktexmf is used to generate the Metafont source file for font,
if possible. For example, ecrm1200 or cmr11.
aha, so it can go away in
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Hi Mojca,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:24:02 -0600, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dvipdfmx
What is with dvipdfmx? Wasn't that one for aleph (which is not in the
minimals any more)?
dvipdfmx is still important in the cjk community, and
Hello Hans,
I figured out where spurious loading of lm-ec and lm-texnansi in XeTeX
comes from.
One is comming from symb-glm.tex. But, when looking at it, it seems to
me that it's not even needed any more, since \leftguillemot,
\rightguillemot, \guilsingleleft and \guilsingleright are defined in
