Re: Implement Fetch?

2015-07-21 Thread Patrick McManus
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote: The main offenders here are: - synchronous on-*-request global notifications I believe this is mostly what :sicking refers to when he talks about [1] https://etherpad.mozilla.org/BetterNeckoSecurityHooks and I agree

Re: Implement Fetch?

2015-07-21 Thread Honza Bambas
On 7/18/2015 1:42, Kyle Huey wrote: To be abundantly clear, no I/O should be happening (or is, to my knowledge) on the main thread when you use XHR. The limitation today is that various Necko state operations (e.g. opening a channel) can only happen on the main thread. The main offenders here

PSA: Enabling APZ on nightly desktop (OS X, Windows)

2015-07-21 Thread Kartikaya Gupta
Just a heads-up that I just pushed bug 1157746 to inbound, which enables async scrolling for trackpad/wheel scrolling by default for nightly OS X desktop builds. It requires e10s, and so if you have e10s disabled it has no effect for you. If you have e10s enabled, you should see smoother/more

Need help in resolving compilation issues in building extension

2015-07-21 Thread shansymantec
Hi, We build our Firefox binary extension with FF sdk. Our binary extension has been successfully built til FF 39 SDK. When I tried to build our extension for FF 40 beta 5 sdk in VS 2013, I am facing the following compilation issues. The same project is built successfully when i point it to FF

Re: Collecting web platform features implementation status

2015-07-21 Thread Anthony Ricaud
On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote: Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites [1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it out the door, we're going to focus on one

Re: Collecting web platform features implementation status

2015-07-21 Thread Tom Schuster
I see 3 (now 4) old pull requests that are unmerged. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Anthony Ricaud anth...@ricaud.me wrote: On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote: Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view on various web platform features. Other browsers have

Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

2015-07-21 Thread J. Ryan Stinnett
The DevTools team is planning to move our code out of /browser/devtools and /toolkit/devtools and into a new top level /devtools directory. The main goals of this are to reduce confusion for new DevTools contributors and help us better organize our work in the future. It will also aid future

Re: Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

2015-07-21 Thread Kevin Brosnan
[tangentially related] Are there plans ot move DevTools to a product in Bugzilla to match this code layout? Kevin On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:54 PM, J. Ryan Stinnett jry...@gmail.com wrote: The DevTools team is planning to move our code out of /browser/devtools and /toolkit/devtools and into a

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: Done. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inboundrevision=939320b957c5 Excellent! - deciding how to handle the situation for people who don't have gtk3 installed on their system. Currently, firefox

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:31:10PM +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:22:05PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: There are a

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:07:23AM +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: Done. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inboundrevision=939320b957c5 Excellent! - deciding how to handle the situation for

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread Martin Stransky
On 07/20/2015 03:30 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com wrote: I believe Flash does. OK, I can't get it to work, but I think it's just my system. I verified that Fedora 22 (and I think 21) shipped GTK3 Firefox. If there aren't

Re: Array.concat

2015-07-21 Thread Mike de Boer
Hi Amit, These are called ‘Generics’ and are available in Firefox as of JavaScript 1.6 - see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array#Array_generic_methods

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:22:05PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: There are a few remaining perma reds and oranges, FWIW. Which ones? I don't see

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: All Groups, XML Activity

2015-07-21 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/21/2015 05:36 AM, L. David Baron wrote: The W3C is proposing revised charters for all of the working groups in the XML Activity: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Jul/.html

Help with removing __iterator__ from JS

2015-07-21 Thread Tom Schuster
Hello! We have an old JS extension that allows objects to modify how they behave when used with for-in. However this extension will never make it into ES6 and is actually incompatible with how iteration is defined there. So please don't use __iterator__anymore. I would really appreciate your

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: All Groups, XML Activity

2015-07-21 Thread James Graham
On 21/07/15 11:29, Ms2ger wrote: This entire Activity is a distraction from the real needs of the web, and if the W3C is serious about its motto, it should focus on those rather than providing support and hosting conferences for people's petty side projects that have no bearing on the web.

Re: Help with removing __iterator__ from JS

2015-07-21 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
If I recall correctly, the difficulty with the OS.File removal is that some clients of this code were taking advantage of the old API in ways that do not match the new one. I will try and take another look at it over the summer. Cheers, David On 21/07/15 13:07, Tom Schuster wrote: Hello! We

Array.concat

2015-07-21 Thread Amit Zur
Hi, I've noticed that Array.concat is defined in Firefox (in addition to Array.prototype.concat). I couldn't find any reference for this in MDN. It seems to work as expected, accepting any number of arrays as arguments and concatenating them. But is this a standard method of the Array

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:22:05PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: There are a few remaining perma reds and oranges, FWIW. Which ones? I don't see anything on elm. Well, it looks like they are now all gone. :) Mike

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread ishikawa
On 2015年07月21日 16:04, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:22:05PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: There are a few remaining perma reds and oranges, FWIW. Which ones? I don't see anything on elm. Well, it looks

Re: Array.concat

2015-07-21 Thread Amit Zur
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:01:53 PM UTC+3, Till Schneidereit wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Mike de Boer mdeb...@mozilla.com wrote: Hi Amit, These are called 'Generics' and are available in Firefox as of JavaScript 1.6 - see

Re: Array.concat

2015-07-21 Thread Till Schneidereit
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Mike de Boer mdeb...@mozilla.com wrote: Hi Amit, These are called ‘Generics’ and are available in Firefox as of JavaScript 1.6 - see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array#Array_generic_methods