Re: Intent to restrict to secure contexts: navigator.geolocation

2016-10-21 Thread Chris Peterson
On 10/21/2016 3:11 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Does this mean that we'd be breaking one in 5 geolocation requests as a > result of this? That seems super high. :( Agreed. For example, my understanding is that this will break http://www.nextbus.com/ (and thus http://www.nextmuni.com/ ) location

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Automotive Working Group

2016-10-21 Thread Tantek Çelik
Ekr, This sounds to me like there are sufficient reasons to formally object to this charter, and as Martin points out, a special case of IoT/WoT (with additional concerns!). David, Thus I too think we should formally object, link to our previous formal objection of the WoT charter (since nearly

Re: Intent to restrict to secure contexts: navigator.geolocation

2016-10-21 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2016-10-21 3:49 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: >> The geolocation API allows web pages to request the user's geolocation, >> drawing from things like GPS on mobile, and doing WiFi / IP based >> geolocation on desktop.

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

2016-10-21 Thread Tantek Çelik
I have reviewed the charter and the current set of deliverables. The work appears to be proceeding reasonably (pragmatically, with many members/implementers including Apple and Google) and reasonably minimally scoped. There is also the companion Second Screen Community Group which appears to be

Intent to restrict to secure contexts: navigator.geolocation

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Barnes
The geolocation API allows web pages to request the user's geolocation, drawing from things like GPS on mobile, and doing WiFi / IP based geolocation on desktop. Due to the privacy risks associated with this functionality, I would like to propose that we restrict this functionality to secure

Re: Windows XP and Vista Long Term Support Plan

2016-10-21 Thread Kyle Huey
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:05 AM, wrote: > My point for the above paragraph is that even if Mozilla stops security > updates for ESR 52, these computers will still need to get around on the > Internet. These machines will still need to do log ins and banking. The world

Re: Windows XP and Vista Long Term Support Plan

2016-10-21 Thread keithgallistel
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 1:33:06 AM UTC-5, Peter Dolanjski wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to provide thorough feedback. > > 3) For Windows Vista, I don't see where the fire is. I realize that it has > > a vastly smaller user base, but it is close to Window 7 code base and API > > wise.