is to provide
better data and metrics (including code coverage). Speaking as a member of
that organization, I'd love to deliver JavaScript code coverage. I'm pretty
sure we need the SpiderMonkey Team to step up and implement something.
Is it too hard for a Google Summer of code project?
Thanks
code coverage). Speaking as a member of
that organization, I'd love to deliver JavaScript code coverage. I'm pretty
sure we need the SpiderMonkey Team to step up and implement something.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Nick Fitzgerald nfitzger...@mozilla.com
wrote:
I recommend reading
https
On 01/19/2015 09:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
I've seen people bring up supporting this sort of stuff in the past, which
usually tends to generate a flurry of +1 this would be wonderful! but
ultimately everything peters out before anything gets done.
The problem was not the solution, but the
On 1/20/2015 4:37 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
This general design is a pragmatic approach to help people implement
different variant of taint-analysis without having to implement taint
analysis in SpiderMonkey. Identically for code-coverage, how much
time do you want to spend at doing
On 1/20/15 5:34 PM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 1/20/2015 4:37 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
Maybe some potential users will show up and mention that they are
willing to get their hand dirty if we were to implement an Analysis
API as discussed back in June. In which case we might be able to
I recommend reading
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger-API or
js/src/doc/Debugger/ for more information.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Nick Fitzgerald nfitzger...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer [image: ]
pidgeo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer pidgeo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Getting good code coverage (line and branch coverage) ultimately requires
fine-grained instrumentation (ideally bytecode-level) not presented by the
current Debugger.
I think you can get fine-grained enough data
Hi, you may know me as the guy who produces the code coverage results
occasionally: http://www.tjhsst.edu/~jcranmer/m-ccov/.
One persistent failure of producing code coverage is the inability to
record code coverage in half of our codebase, the half that is written
in JavaScript. There are
Hello,
Thanks for the various answers.
On 17/06/2014 00:53, Clint Talbert wrote:
Inline
On 6/16/2014 10:23, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am working on providing weekly code coverage of Firefox code.
For now, I am able to do that for C/C++ code.
Awesome. Where are you putting these
On 6/20/2014 4:25 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
It takes around 26 hours on my workstation to run all the tests
and about 4 days on (old?) Macbook pro.
I haven't work on improving this yet.
I am mildly distrustful of results that aren't running on as close to
the same configuration as our
On 20/06/2014 14:00, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 6/20/2014 4:25 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
It takes around 26 hours on my workstation to run all the tests
and about 4 days on (old?) Macbook pro.
I haven't work on improving this yet.
I am mildly distrustful of results that aren't running on
On 6/20/14, 8:00 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
(there is 0%
coverage of angle).
That's not surprising given that the code coverage test is being done on
Linux, is it?
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
On 6/20/14, 5:00 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 6/20/2014 4:25 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
It takes around 26 hours on my workstation to run all the tests
and about 4 days on (old?) Macbook pro.
I haven't work on improving this yet.
I am mildly distrustful of results that aren't running on as
Hello,
I am working on providing weekly code coverage of Firefox code.
For now, I am able to do that for C/C++ code.
I would like to know if anyone tried to generate code coverage recently
on the Javascript code of Firefox (or Firefox OS)?
I saw some b2g reports [1] talking about Coverage but I
On 6/16/14 7:23 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am working on providing weekly code coverage of Firefox code.
For now, I am able to do that for C/C++ code.
I would like to know if anyone tried to generate code coverage recently
on the Javascript code of Firefox (or Firefox OS)?
I saw
On 2014-06-16, 1:23 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am working on providing weekly code coverage of Firefox code.
For now, I am able to do that for C/C++ code.
Awesome, where can we find those reports?
Thanks!
Ehsan
___
dev-platform mailing
Inline
On 6/16/2014 10:23, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am working on providing weekly code coverage of Firefox code.
For now, I am able to do that for C/C++ code.
Awesome. Where are you putting these reports? What is the workload used
to generate those reports?
I would like to know if
On 6/16/2014 12:23 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am working on providing weekly code coverage of Firefox code.
For now, I am able to do that for C/C++ code.
I would like to know if anyone tried to generate code coverage recently
on the Javascript code of Firefox (or Firefox OS)?
Define
18 matches
Mail list logo
