On 3/5/11 3:22 PM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
Brian Smith wrote:
Ritmo2k wrote:
Anyone know if its possible to configure Firefox to implicitly trust
all certificate authorities installed in the Windows Trusted Root
Certification Authorities Store?
Firefox does not support this yet. See:
Zack,
I think having some kind of statement from the Moz community could be
helpful, and a good excuse for Moz folks to get up to speed on the spec.
With respect to the Section 3 text, it may be best simply to voice your
thoughts directly on the DANE list. I don't think the current text is
On 2/11/11 6:04 PM, Eddy Nigg wrote:
Indeed, PAYPA1.COM, MICR0S0FT.COM, PAYPAL.DOM.COM,
BANK0FAMERICA.COMall goes.
Of course not, that's why we have this:
http://www.antiphishing.org/reports/APWG_GlobalPhishingSurvey_2H2009.pdf
Have you actually read that report? It details a rapid
On 2/6/11 1:01 PM, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 02/06/2011 07:11 PM, From Zack Weinberg:
I'm going to ask you the same question I asked Nelson: In a
hypothetical world where DNSSEC+TLSA completely supersedes DV (but
people still use OV/EV for high-value sites) what do you see as having
been lost? Or,
On 2/7/11 6:31 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
My primary worry of the this spec as is is that DNSSEC is trying to be
the end-all-be-all authority. That's a recipe for disaster. Keeping all
my server keys in sync with the DNSSEC record? And if I have OV/EV, I
have to keep it in sync with the
5 matches
Mail list logo
