Discussion about Bug 914690 - In Firefox 24 and following, mark all versions of Java as unsafe

2013-10-28 Thread helpcrypto helpcrypto
*Hi all* Before starting, I'll to apologize for any incorrect grammar or typo I could do. I'm not a native and I'm trying my best. Altough I think most of us agree that *The era of Java Applets must end*, after asking a few questions to WebCrypto WG, seems they dont share this tought/they dont

Re: Discussion about Bug 914690 - In Firefox 24 and following, mark all versions of Java as unsafe

2013-10-28 Thread florian . bender
On Monday, October 28, 2013 1:50:42 PM UTC+1, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote: Something similar to Webcrypto should work, but having user keys in mind. AFAIK, WebCrypto[1] is the replacement for the current window.crypto (and the reason why the latter one should be dropped). If there's anything

Re: Discussion about Bug 914690 - In Firefox 24 and following, mark all versions of Java as unsafe

2013-10-28 Thread Mountie Lee
Hi. I'm from Korea which is one of the countries widely using plugin based crypto technologies. also I'm the member of W3C WebCrypto WG. I feel with current draft WebCrypto spec, it can not be the replacement of plugins (java applet, activex, npapi...) the signature can be generated SILENTLY

Re: Discussion about Bug 914690 - In Firefox 24 and following, mark all versions of Java as unsafe

2013-10-28 Thread helpcrypto helpcrypto
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:03 PM, florian.ben...@quantumedia.de wrote: On Monday, October 28, 2013 1:50:42 PM UTC+1, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote: Something similar to Webcrypto should work, but having user keys in mind. AFAIK, WebCrypto[1] is the replacement for the current window.crypto (and