On Friday, 7 December 2018 18:24:38 CET Paul Smith wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Martin!
>
> On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > Unfortunately, we can't say that we have a PAKE, so I appreciate that
> > you aren't able to just drop that in.
>
> A concern is that I have
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:26 PM Paul Smith wrote:
> Another thing that I didn't bring up: I need to implement this in other
> languages (at least Java and Python), so clients can connect to the
> service. So I need to consider availability in other crypto libraries
> like Python ssl and javax
Thanks for your reply Martin!
On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Unfortunately, we can't say that we have a PAKE, so I appreciate that
> you aren't able to just drop that in.
A concern is that I have to support full backward-compatibility, not a
"flag day" upgrade, so
Hi Paul,
I think NSS has all you need here. Including TLS 1.3 should you
prefer that. Unfortunately, we can't say that we have a PAKE, so I
appreciate that you aren't able to just drop that in. In the
meantime,,,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:18 AM Paul Smith wrote:
> I have a session key from
Hi all. Hopefully this is the right place.
I have a system (first created ~8 years ago) based on SRP and RC4 (I
know). This system creates TCP connections rarely and uses them for a
very long time, and they cannot be dropped/reconnected without user-
visible disruption, so it's very different
5 matches
Mail list logo
