Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-03-23 Thread gegard4321
-are-others-SHA256-cipher-suits-in-Firefox-27-tp306678p311535.html Sent from the Mozilla - Cryptography mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-03-23 Thread Julien Vehent
On 2014-03-23 11:43, gegard4321 wrote: Another reason to enable DHE_RSA_AES_*_GCM: Mozilla's new account system only supports RSA and DHE_RSA ciphers: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=accounts.firefox.com Same goes for mozilla.org and bugzilla. On the server side, we are working

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-03-23 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:43:35AM -0700, gegard4321 wrote: Another reason to enable DHE_RSA_AES_*_GCM: Mozilla's new account system only supports RSA and DHE_RSA ciphers: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=accounts.firefox.com Same goes for mozilla.org and bugzilla. Firefox

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-03-23 Thread gegard4321
.nabble.com/Where-are-others-SHA256-cipher-suits-in-Firefox-27-tp306678p311571.html Sent from the Mozilla - Cryptography mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-09 Thread gegard4321
don't really have alternatives. But we have to go with what we currently know. Hopefully alternatives will emerge in the near future. -- View this message in context: http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/Where-are-others-SHA256-cipher-suits-in-Firefox-27-tp306678p306864.html Sent from the Mozilla

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-07 Thread Matthijs Janssen
Regarding the other variants of AES-GCM -TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 There are some sites support AES-GCM that use only ciphers with RSA key exchange. I think it would be best not to support new standards that don't provide Forward Secrecy, but on the other hand, if this cipher is enabled

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-06 Thread Brian Smith
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Rasj rasj...@gmail.com wrote: Where are others? For example: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (0x3d) See https://briansmith.org/browser-ciphersuites-01.html. Also, please look at the archives of this mailing list. There have been several DOZEN of emails about the

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-06 Thread Rasj
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 12:50:16 PM UTC+4, Brian Smith wrote: Many web-sites have only TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 as kind of strong(even without PFS) and weak RC4 and 3DES. Please provide some examples of such sites. Some Banks. You can include it by default but turn it off if

Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-06 Thread gegard4321-bugzi...@yahoo.co.uk
Regarding the other variants of AES-GCM -TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 There are some sites support AES-GCM that use only ciphers with RSA key exchange. I think it would be best not to support new standards that don't provide Forward Secrecy, but on the other hand, if this cipher is enabled

Re: Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:57:34PM +, gegard4321-bugzi...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Regarding the other variants of AES-GCM -TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 There are some sites support AES-GCM that use only ciphers with RSA key exchange. I think it would be best not to support new standards

Where are others SHA256 cipher suits in Firefox 27?

2014-02-05 Thread Rasj
Hi, I see only: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0xc02b) TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0xc02f) Where are others? For example: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (0x3d) Many web-sites have only TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 as kind of strong(even without PFS) and weak RC4 and