Re: Using SWIG to create NSS interface for scripting languages?

2006-04-04 Thread Heikki Toivonen
Steve Parkinson wrote: 1) Private function definitions. SWIG can make wrapper functions for all I am slightly in favor of explicitly listing the functions to export in .i files. 3) NSS is a fairly object-oriented API. But, it lacks a formal definition of the objects, and how they

Re: Using SWIG to create NSS interface for scripting languages?

2006-04-04 Thread Heikki Toivonen
Steve Parkinson wrote: I like the way the .NET API is consistent, and whether you use C#, Managed C++, or Visual basic, the API is always the same. If we leave the OO implementation up to the scripting language wrapper, then we will potentially have a different API for each language. I

Re: Adding Ciphers

2006-04-04 Thread Julien Pierre
Jay Potter wrote: Any suggestions on what I would need to do to get this implimented? A lot of convincing that it is worth doing, to begin with. IMO, pre-shared keys have no place in a general-purpose Internet browser such as Mozilla. The authors of RFC4279 agree - see section 1.1 .