Re: id-ce-nameConstraints (2.5.29.30) in the real world

2013-11-04 Thread Rob Stradling
Hmmm...why are all of the DNSNames duplicated? The ones with a dot at the beginning don't need to be there, do they? On 02/11/13 15:13, Kaspar Brand wrote: On 02.11.2013 15:40, Erwann Abalea wrote: You missed the exclusion of IPv6 addresses. So this CA can certify for any IPv6 address range.

Re: id-ce-nameConstraints (2.5.29.30) in the real world

2013-11-04 Thread Rob Stradling
On 02/11/13 14:40, Erwann Abalea wrote: Le samedi 2 novembre 2013 08:39:53 UTC+1, Kaspar Brand a écrit : 11 hours ago, a new certificate was given birth to which I would like to share with this list for edification purposes. I think that the audience here should be able to fully appreciate what

Re: id-ce-nameConstraints (2.5.29.30) in the real world

2013-11-04 Thread Rob Stradling
Kaspar, since you're looking for examples of Name Constraints in the real world, this site's certificate chain has a slightly less crazy example... ;-) https://premier.intel.com On 02/11/13 07:39, Kaspar Brand wrote: 11 hours ago, a new certificate was given birth to which I would like to

Re: id-ce-nameConstraints (2.5.29.30) in the real world

2013-11-04 Thread steve.medin
Erwann, true, we did omit the required IPv6 constraint. Given the expiration of the cross-certificate, we were not able to wait for the 5.4 version of our PKI software currently in QA, which enables IPv6 excluded subtrees, to be released. We expect to make longer term arrangements with BIT at a

Re: id-ce-nameConstraints (2.5.29.30) in the real world

2013-11-04 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 04.11.2013 11:44, Rob Stradling wrote: Kaspar, since you're looking for examples of Name Constraints in the real world, this site's certificate chain has a slightly less crazy example... ;-) https://premier.intel.com Or https://www.harica.gr. Or https://www.emporium.vt.edu. Or