On 11/18/2013 07:00 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Hi everyone,
Following Microsoft's announcement re: SHA-1, some CAs are asking
browser and OS vendors about the ubiquity of SHA-256 support. It would
be a help to them if we could say:
- Which version of NSS first supported SHA-256
Gerv, SHA-256
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 06:47:08PM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
Also, AES implementations are highly optimized, well-audited,
well-tested, and are more likely to be side-channel free. Camellia
doesn't get used very
On 11/19/2013 02:50 AM, Rob Stradling wrote:
On 11/18/2013 07:00 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Hi everyone,
Following Microsoft's announcement re: SHA-1, some CAs are asking
browser and OS vendors about the ubiquity of SHA-256 support. It would
be a help to them if we could say:
- Which
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:31:22 AM UTC-8, Štefan Baebler wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:19:45 PM UTC+1, Mike Price wrote:
Does anyone know the secret to using Java's jarsigner.exe to sign a FireFox
.xpi add on? I have seen a few references that seem to imply that this can
On 11/19/2013 10:40 AM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Bob's answer is accurate.
Note that CAs are more interested in SHA-2 based signature support
rather than plain SHA-2 support. So another way to track down the NSS
version is to look at the CVS history of the secvfy.c file:
5 matches
Mail list logo