Re: Chrome: From NSS to OpenSSL

2014-04-08 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
Ryan Sleevi a écrit : That was an interesting rant, thanks. reliance on PKCS#11 means that there are non-trivial overheads when doing something as simple as hashing with SHA-1. For something that is such a simple transformation, multiple locks must be acquired and the entire NSS internals

Re: Chrome: From NSS to OpenSSL

2014-04-08 Thread Alan Braggins
On 08/04/14 13:11, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: Ryan Sleevi a écrit : reliance on PKCS#11 means that there are non-trivial overheads when doing something as simple as hashing with SHA-1. For something that is such a simple transformation, multiple locks must be acquired and the entire NSS

Re: Chrome: From NSS to OpenSSL

2014-04-08 Thread Robert Relyea
On 04/08/2014 06:31 AM, Alan Braggins wrote: On 08/04/14 13:11, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: Ryan Sleevi a écrit : reliance on PKCS#11 means that there are non-trivial overheads when doing something as simple as hashing with SHA-1. For something that is such a simple transformation, multiple