On Tue, January 19, 2016 2:56 pm, s...@gmx.ch wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're already having some discussions about SHA-1, but I'll split this
> up into a new thread.
>
> The initial goal of bug 942515 was to mark certs as insecure, that are
> valid 'notBefore >= 2016-01-01' (means issued to use in
Hi
We're already having some discussions about SHA-1, but I'll split this
up into a new thread.
The initial goal of bug 942515 was to mark certs as insecure, that are
valid 'notBefore >= 2016-01-01' (means issued to use in 2016+) AND also
for certs that are valid 'notAfter >= 2017-1-1' (means
2 matches
Mail list logo