On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Anders Rundgren
anders.rundg...@telia.com wrote:
On 2012-04-09 12:13, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
http://www.w3.org/2011/11/webcryptography-charter.html
BSmith ans RRelyea directed me there also. All fishes go to sea... ;)
The really big fishes (Google,
So, IIUC, both of you consider using system/os/platform keystore
(directly [or hooked]) the best option?
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
On 2012-04-09 10:27, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
So, IIUC, both of you consider using system/os/platform keystore
(directly [or hooked]) the best option?
IMHO it depends quite a bit on what your target audience is.
If you (for example) are working with server-applications you
are likely to
IMHO it depends quite a bit on what your target audience is.
Document signing on a web browser, its *always* done using a java applets.
Tax payment, traffic bills, more taxes...in hour case, official
documents signed by the ministry autorized people.
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
On 2012-04-09 11:21, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
IMHO it depends quite a bit on what your target audience is.
Document signing on a web browser, its *always* done using a java applets.
Tax payment, traffic bills, more taxes...in hour case, official
documents signed by the ministry
http://www.w3.org/2011/11/webcryptography-charter.html
BSmith ans RRelyea directed me there also. All fishes go to sea... ;)
http://webpki.org/papers/wasp/wasp-tutorial.pdf
http://webpki.org/papers/keygen2/sks-keygen2-exec-level-presentation.pdf
I think i already read both documents some
On 2012-04-09 12:13, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
http://www.w3.org/2011/11/webcryptography-charter.html
BSmith ans RRelyea directed me there also. All fishes go to sea... ;)
The really big fishes (Google, Apple, and Microsoft) haven't said a word
(in public) about their interest in this. I
On 2012-04-02 21:07, Robert Relyea wrote:
On 03/27/2012 01:00 AM, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
Cough, cough...exit(CKR_OK) != return CKR_OK...cough, cough
Now cert8 is modified always (with or without our module).
Anyway, can someone tell me why cert8 is rewrited on each run/close?
Because
IIRC, NSS doesnt have an official mantainer on Mozilla bugs, isnt it?
If this happens, its probably the source of many problems here. I have
filed a few bugs and most of then arent even checked.
To be fair honest, im also guilty of that, but i dont feel confident
enough to edit Mozilla source.
On 2012-04-04 13:04, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
IIRC, NSS doesnt have an official mantainer on Mozilla bugs, isnt it?
If this happens, its probably the source of many problems here. I have
filed a few bugs and most of then arent even checked.
To be fair honest, im also guilty of that, but i
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Anders Rundgren
anders.rundg...@telia.com wrote:
Mozilla should IMO rather hook into the
other vendors cryptographic solution, possibly at the expense of NSS.
According to a [colleage] of mine Chrome even use the platform's SSL
implementation! Well, not in
Thanks for the info. Countdown to sqlite...
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
On 03/27/2012 01:00 AM, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
Cough, cough...exit(CKR_OK) != return CKR_OK...cough, cough
Now cert8 is modified always (with or without our module).
Anyway, can someone tell me why cert8 is rewrited on each run/close?
Because that's how the old berkeley DB works. It's
Hi all.
Due some problems using Thunderbird ESR, we have found the following,
and would like to ask the experts...
We have noticed Thunderbird 10.3 (probably older versions too)
rewrites cert8.db each time it closes. The file its the same, but
the modified date has changed.
- Is this normal?
-
Cough, cough...exit(CKR_OK) != return CKR_OK...cough, cough
Now cert8 is modified always (with or without our module).
Anyway, can someone tell me why cert8 is rewrited on each run/close?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:18 AM, helpcrypto helpcrypto
helpcry...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
Due some
15 matches
Mail list logo