On 23/05/17 14:08, ryan.sle...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think it should be a policy
OK. Are you able to propose wording and a location within the policy
(section 5.1) for both of these proposals? If you are willing to do
that, I'm happy to include it.
Gerv
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 3:58:21 AM UTC-4, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 19/05/17 17:02, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> > I support both of those requirements, so that we can avoid it on a
> > 'problematic practices' side :)
>
> But you think this should be a policy requirement, not a Problematic
>
We are moving from OpenSSL to Java to handle CSRs for our CA. Our devices
require a custom 'description' field as part of the Subject sequence.
(Related link)
https://linux.die.net/man/3/x509_name_get_text_by_nid
The following command line fails (we are using a HSM but that's not relevant to
3 matches
Mail list logo
