Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-08 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
Very well, how does one revive a project? Gintas 2016-12-08 21:01 GMT+01:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) : > > Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of > > Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ? > > > > Nicolas > > > Yes, I agree. >

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-08 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ? Nicolas > Le 5 déc. 2016 à 08:04, Jan Matèrne (jhm) a écrit : > > I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. > > The last release was in 11/2013.

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-07 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
I decided to take a quick look at the build process and it's not broken per se, rather it's hardcoded to Eclipse SDK 3.7.1 foe Win32. I would like to make the process to adapt to the build platform. Any suggestions for a reasonable Eclipse baseline? Should we target Java 8, that would be 4.5 (or

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-07 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
> Le 7 déc. 2016 à 12:34, Gintautas Grigelionis a > écrit : > > I would prefer an agreement on status. IvyDE is dependent on Ivy and > ideally their release cycles should be synced. > Since there seem to be some changes brewing in Ivy, IvyDE could be used as > a test

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-07 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
I would prefer an agreement on status. IvyDE is dependent on Ivy and ideally their release cycles should be synced. Since there seem to be some changes brewing in Ivy, IvyDE could be used as a test case. Gintas 2016-12-07 11:37 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > On 2016-12-07,

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-12-07, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > Somebody mentioned that IvyDE build process is broken and I would like to > look into that if it could help to prevent retirement. That would be wonderful, regardless of whether it prevents retirement. Stefan

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-07 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
Somebody mentioned that IvyDE build process is broken and I would like to look into that if it could help to prevent retirement. Gintas 2016-12-07 10:00 GMT+01:00 Dominique Devienne : > +1 > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < >

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-07 Thread Dominique Devienne
+1 On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Le 6 déc. 2016 6:51 PM, "Nicolas Lalevée" a > écrit : > > > +1 > > > > Nicolas > > > > > Le 6 déc. 2016 à 17:22, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > >

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-06 Thread Jean-Louis Boudart
+1 Le 6 déc. 2016 6:51 PM, "Nicolas Lalevée" a écrit : > +1 > > Nicolas > > > Le 6 déc. 2016 à 17:22, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > > On 2016-12-05, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > > > >> I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. > > > > +0 > > > > The

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-06 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
+1 Nicolas > Le 6 déc. 2016 à 17:22, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > On 2016-12-05, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > >> I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. > > +0 > > The discussion in the "Ivy" thread makes me think we'd probably want to > update it with new Ivy releases, even if

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

2016-12-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-12-05, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. +0 The discussion in the "Ivy" thread makes me think we'd probably want to update it with new Ivy releases, even if nothing else changes in between. Stefan