Erik Huelsmann wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Küng wrote:
Anyone looked at this yet?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200801.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
The patch/argument made perfect sense, although I'm leaning
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Küng wrote:
Anyone looked at this yet?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200801.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
The patch/argument made perfect sense, although I'm leaning towards a switch
to
Anyone looked at this yet?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200801.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan
Stefan Küng wrote:
Hi,
While debugging problems with Subversion on Windows (checkouts failed if
some paths had longer names than around 250 chars), I found a bug in apr:
apr
Stefan Küng wrote:
Anyone looked at this yet?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200801.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The patch/argument made perfect sense, although I'm leaning towards a switch
to decide if it's a file or path name (if it is even possible for that to
work).
I'll
Hi,
While debugging problems with Subversion on Windows (checkouts failed if
some paths had longer names than around 250 chars), I found a bug in apr:
apr transparently converts long pathnames to the Windows specific format
for long names (it prepends '\\?\'). But that only works properly
