Re: Streaming strings in JXTemplate

2005-05-22 Thread Leszek Gawron
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: The main reason for using DOM in some cases (chosen by user at runtime) is the ability to avoid SAXException. SaxBuffer does not offer such functionality as it just stores sax bits and does not check if xml is well formed. And neither does DOM. So can you explain your

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: IMO, OSGi seem to be the best choice for kernel for Cocoon's block architecture and there is (if I haven't missed something important) a low risk, incremental and evolutionary way to get there. Hmm, I'm currently not

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: - breaking up the monolitic Cocoon - getting over the Java jar hell - making development of Cocoon extensions outside of the Cocoon project much easier (why there are hardly any Cocoon based projects out, except Daisy, Lenya, Forrest and two or three others) -

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: SNIP/ But again, if I'm the only one with these feelings, I can simply shut up and watch the show :( Just to clarify: of course, this doesn't mean that I would not help or contribute. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, SN AG http://www.s-und-n.de

Re: ApacheCon- Blockathon - When do we start?

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: Ok ...so the guys from http://100days.de will be sponsering the meeting room on sunday. They provide free internet access, a projector and even some coffee :) Nice! But upto now there are only three of us (Reinhard, you and me) and I'm wondering if we really need a

Re: ApacheCon- Blockathon - When do we start?

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Ok ...so the guys from http://100days.de will be sponsering the meeting room on sunday. They provide free internet access, a projector and even some coffee :) Nice! But upto now there are only three of us (Reinhard, you and me) and I'm wondering

[RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
(was: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon) Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: snip/ We should move 2.2 out the door as soon as possible and target real blocks for a later release. So, try out OSGi if you want, but please not in the trunk. snip/ And AFAIU it's out of discussion that the

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: - breaking up the monolitic Cocoon - getting over the Java jar hell - making development of Cocoon extensions outside of the Cocoon project much easier (why there are hardly any Cocoon based projects out, except Daisy, Lenya, Forrest and two

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Leszek Gawron wrote: snip/ I tried to find any starters for eclipse's OSGi implementation. Not a single useful page. If we are to make users read OSGi specification, then seek for help in external projects that are hardly documented we get the same problem in a fancy new outfit. OSGi is a

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: - breaking up the monolitic Cocoon - getting over the Java jar hell - making development of Cocoon extensions outside of the Cocoon project much easier (why there are hardly any Cocoon based projects out, except Daisy, Lenya, Forrest and two

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sometime ago we started on drafting a versioning policy http://cocoon.apache.org/versioning.html but that didn't find much interest :( So, whatever we write down/decide as a policy, you need committers doing some work and trying to push that. Projects like Eclipse have a far better grounding as

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: IMO it will. AFAIU the plugin concept in Eclipse is considered straight forward for most people. The blocks will be very similar to plugins. Ok, but even if it's simple, you have to learn it :) Its not an exchange of Avalon with OSGi. I know, I didn't mean a

Re: ApacheCon- Blockathon - When do we start?

2005-05-22 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Ok ...so the guys from http://100days.de will be sponsering the meeting room on sunday. They provide free internet access, a projector and even some coffee :) Nice! But upto now there are only three of us (Reinhard, you and me) and I'm wondering

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: IMO it will. AFAIU the plugin concept in Eclipse is considered straight forward for most people. The blocks will be very similar to plugins. Ok, but even if it's simple, you have to learn it :) Its not an exchange of Avalon with OSGi. I

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sometime ago we started on drafting a versioning policy http://cocoon.apache.org/versioning.html but that didn't find much interest :( hmmm, I had the impression that we agreed on this. Maybe only a vote is missing. -- Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant,

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: (was: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon) Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: snip/ We should move 2.2 out the door as soon as possible and target real blocks for a later release. So, try out OSGi if you want, but please not in the trunk. snip/ And AFAIU

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sometime ago we started on drafting a versioning policy http://cocoon.apache.org/versioning.html but that didn't find much interest :( hmmm, I had the impression that we agreed on this. Maybe only a vote is missing. I'm note sure, but I

Re: sorotn

2005-05-22 Thread Fabian LoneStar Frédérick
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: dev@cocoon.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: sorotn Datum: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:15:34 +0200 Fabian LoneStar Frédérick wrote: Hi, I just released a small struts parser tool under cocoon.Maybe it

Databasereader problem, cannot download

2005-05-22 Thread Tuomo L
Posting this here, since no reply from users@cocoon.apache.org - Forwarded message from Tuomo L [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Hi, What's wrong, when this warning appears in log: Assuming client reset stream ? Every file we're trying to return from db comes out as 0 bytes, and the error (warning)

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Ralph Goers
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: snip Since 2000 we have managed to ship a handfull of 2.0 and a handfull of 2.1 releases. Considering the amount of activity and the volume and quality of what have done during that period it must be a hard to beat record in conservative version numbering ;)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34557] - Outdated webapp tutorial

2005-05-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34557. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: snip/ I'm currently still missing the *big picture*. What are blocks, how does Cocoon look like with them. Can I develop something without blocks? What do I have to learn? And so on. This might be because I didn't have so much time for Cocoon in the last weeks, don't

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: snip/ IMO we should find a less demanding and more realistic attitude for Cocoon releases, so that we can go towards release early, release often. Planning what should be part of the next major release seem harmfull, as the relase can stall

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: All current blocks, the core and libraries that are used by several bundles are packaged as bundles. These are deployed in a OSGi kernel. During development the Cocoon bundles can be deployed within the OSGi kernel of Eclipse together with various Cocoon

[PlanetCocoon] Categorization, taxonomy, folksonomy... what for ?

2005-05-22 Thread Sebastien Arbogast
Hi everybody, I just published a new entry in my blog on PlanetCocoon as a reaction to Clay Shirky's article and how we can apply all those technologies together inside PlanetCocoon to make it a useful platform for all of you. In parallel we are in the process of defining clearer navigation paths

jsf-cocoon improvements

2005-05-22 Thread Fab Psycho
Hi, I'd like to contribute to jsf on Cocoon.Where can I find a todo list for this and should I work against 2.1 or 2.2 branch ? Regards, Fab _

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Ralph Goers wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: snip/ Planning what should be part of the next major release seem harmfull, as the relase can stall forever if there is a difference between what we would like to have in the release and what we actually are implementing. I don't think I

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Don't know. Reinhard and maybe Sylvain at least seem to use it for customer systems maybe there are more. Yes, it's my plan to use trunk for my current customer application because I want to use the new jxtemplate implementation and the per-sitemap-classloader that

Re: svn commit: r171293 - in /cocoon: blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/binding/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/formmodel/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/resources/js/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/validation/impl/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/messages/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/resources/ trunk/

2005-05-22 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 22/mag/05, alle 10:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=171293view=rev Log: sync captcha Thanks for doing this, Sylvain. I was planning to do it myself ASAP, but since you beat me to it... :) Ugo -- Ugo Cei Tech Blog:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32728] - SearchGenerator return has-previous false when meet the no. 2 page

2005-05-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32728. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: svn commit: r171293 - in /cocoon: blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/binding/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/formmodel/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/resources/js/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/validation/impl/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/messages/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/resources/ trunk/

2005-05-22 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Dom, 22 de Mayo de 2005, 15:15, Ugo Cei dijo: Il giorno 22/mag/05, alle 10:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=171293view=rev Log: sync captcha Thanks for doing this, Sylvain. I was planning to do it myself ASAP, but since you beat me to it... :)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33637] - i18n messages don't work for required fields

2005-05-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33637. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: In my opinion, 2.2 is more or less feature complete; there are *many* things to cleanup Definitely. and I'm currently playing with adding administration and monitoring. Uh? What are these features? Would you mind sharing this with us? Sylvain -- Sylvain

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34906] - [Patch] User-Agent is PARAMETER, not HEADER in Command-line interface

2005-05-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34906. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: svn commit: r171293 - in /cocoon: blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/binding/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/formmodel/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/resources/js/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/validation/impl/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/messages/ blocks/core/forms/trunk/samples/resources/ trunk/

2005-05-22 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Antonio Gallardo wrote: On Dom, 22 de Mayo de 2005, 15:15, Ugo Cei dijo: Il giorno 22/mag/05, alle 10:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=171293view=rev Log: sync captcha Thanks for doing this, Sylvain. I was planning to do it myself ASAP,

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Reinhard Poetz wrote: AFAIU only some work on cForms is missing (flowscript API and repeater binding) That's far from the only work to do IMO, as there are a lot of semi-finished core features. Some that come to mind: refactored object model, sitemap listeners, VPCs, third-party

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Users never really understood Avalon; but interestingly everyone understands Spring - which is the same concepts of Avalon but done differently (I know, I simplify here a little bit, please, all Spring lovers forgive me for now!). Adding a

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Ralph Goers wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: For our current situation I think we could release a 2.2.0 right away. It doesn't contain what we planned for but OTH it contains a lot of goodies that we didin't plan for and that should be usefull for a larger

Re: [RT] Releases

2005-05-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 23 May 2005 02:32, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Hmm, that is to overdo it IMO. Plans and todo lists and Bugzilla entries can be very usefull for knowing what is left todo, weak points etc. The problem is when we put together a number of todo lists and say that they constitute the next

Re: [PlanetCocoon] 4 new ideas to discuss on Planet Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Sebastien, ...I've just published four new ideas on my blog.. About Typo3-like documentation matrix - I've been thinking for a while that a matrix of our *samples* would be a big help: having all samples listed on a single page (and possibly categorized or folksonomized) would make it

Releasing 2.2 (was: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon)

2005-05-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 23 mai 05, à 07:13, Reinhard Poetz a écrit : ...Let's release Cocoon 2.2 alpha1 as soon as possible. When the contracts are stable we use the beta postfix. This will increase the number of people who use and test the release and finally we can release Cocoon 2.2.0 final... Releasing 2.2

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Uh? What are these features? Would you mind sharing this with us? Sure; I already mentioned this months ago and even asked on this list for help; but noone was interested :( Anyways, I'm thinking of adding a JMX interface, so you can monitor your Cocoon instance using

Micro kernel use cases? (was: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon)

2005-05-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 22 mai 05, à 20:24, Daniel Fagerstrom a écrit : ...It would require quite a lot of work to give a fair overview of what we have discussed about this in the last three or so years. You find some info in http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/Blocks... Would it be possible to come up with a (small)

Re: [RT] Micro kernel based Cocoon

2005-05-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 23 mai 05, à 07:32, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ..I'm thinking of adding a JMX interface, so you can monitor your Cocoon instance using JMX... ...The second part - which is much more difficult - would be to allow to change some values during runtime... Hmm...maybe this second part