To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Michael,
Le 09/01/2011 08:58, Michael Giannakopoulos a écrit :
Thanks a lot for the explanation! One question that i have is this: Commons
Math libraries don't include a package with
'org.apache.commmons.math.exception' (at least as far as the version 2.1 is
concerned...). Is there another
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
AbstractCookieSpec uses an unsynchronised HashMap, so is not thread-safe.
AIUI, ConcurrentHashMap has much better performance than a
synchronised HashMap - but of course we are not using synch here.
A quick test using the code at [1] (1 thread, 1 VM) appears to show
that the performance of CHM
Why did you post this to the commons dev list instead of http-components dev?
Ralph
On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote:
AbstractCookieSpec uses an unsynchronised HashMap, so is not thread-safe.
AIUI, ConcurrentHashMap has much better performance than a
synchronised HashMap - but of
Hi,
Thanks! It should probably be mikl, my username, instead of mikkel, my
name. I don't have access to committing these two weeks, but I'll
change it in two weeks time.
Cheers, Mikkel.
2011/1/8 pste...@apache.org:
Author: psteitz
Date: Sat Jan 8 17:50:54 2011
New Revision: 1056747
URL:
On 9 January 2011 16:20, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Why did you post this to the commons dev list instead of http-components dev?
Oops, sorry!
However, the timings might still be interesting for Commons components...
Ralph
On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote:
I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the
compatible changes from the trunk to the LANG_2_X branch - details in
the release notes:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
The site is here:
On 9 January 2011 22:46, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the
compatible changes from the trunk to the LANG_2_X branch - details in
the release notes:
I'm all for a 2.6 release, nice work. If we can resolve the clone issue
([LANG-302]), that would be good too.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Web:
On 10 January 2011 00:26, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 January 2011 22:46, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the
compatible changes
Or kick it off at apache-extras.org :)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Frank,
why not propose this as another project?
It requires more maintenance, that is true.
Sandbox is designed for that, including to evaluate if there are user bases.
I tend to
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
14 matches
Mail list logo