Re: TEXT-77 | String palindrome API

Le 22/06/2017 à 06:28, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit : > But would be good to find someone, maybe a bioinformatician, that could > confirm if it would be useful, and give a few use cases, for that. What about waiting for someone with an actual and sensible use case to request the inclusion of

Re: TEXT-77 | String palindrome API

+1 agreed with Emmanuel, better we park/close this issue for now. Its very trivial and can be pull whenever there will be actual requirement. Regards, Amey On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, 1:50 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/06/2017 à 06:28, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit : > > > But

[GitHub] commons-fileupload issue #1: Commons fileupload headerfix

Github user developerSid commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/1 I totally agree this was a pretty botched pull request. How would you like me to handle this once I get it fixed? Leave this thread open and comment here with the new pull request?

[GitHub] commons-fileupload pull request #1: Commons fileupload headerfix

Github user developerSid closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] commons-fileupload issue #1: Commons fileupload headerfix

Github user developerSid commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/1 I just checked the code out, and this has already been fixed. Looks like the change I wanted to try and get into upstream was done on 3/16/2011 by Wiedmann. I'm going to close this.

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #50: TEXT-90: Add CharacterPredicates for ASCII le...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/50 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1799506 - in /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/src/site/xdoc: dependencies.xml userguide/howto_hierarchical.xml

Am 21.06.2017 um 22:07 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Why use an old version of Jackson? Thanks for the catch. Version updated. Oliver > > Gary > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: Jun 21, 2017 13:01 > Subject: svn commit: r1799506 - in >

Re: svn commit: r1799599 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/pom.xml

Am 22.06.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Gary Gregory: > But why use an older version of Jackson? ;-) This was the version that was referenced by the patch. I did not check against the most recent version. Maybe the original author can answer this? Oliver > > Gary > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:40

[GitHub] commons-text issue #54: TEXT-93: RandomStringGenerator accepts a list of val...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54 [](https://:/builds/12093960) Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 97.306% when pulling **2dfadf4f8b51ae65d1b1b1f17afa3387b908c31f

[RNG] Pending issues

Hi. Github and Maven experts, please have a look at the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-38 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-31 Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: svn commit: r1799599 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/pom.xml

But why use an older version of Jackson? ;-) Gary On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, wrote: > Author: oheger > Date: Thu Jun 22 17:40:53 2017 > New Revision: 1799599 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1799599=rev > Log: > Updated dependency to jackson-databind. > >

[configuration] checkstyle fails build

FYI, to whom can take the time to fix this. When I run 'mvn clean install', I get: [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:check (default) @ commons-configuration2 --- [INFO] There are 23 errors reported by Checkstyle 6.1.1 with

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #54: TEXT-93: RandomStringGenerator accepts a list...

GitHub user ameyjadiye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54 TEXT-93: RandomStringGenerator accepts a list of valid characters Added selectFrom feature : ``` selectFromList(char[] chars) selectFromList(List charList) ``` You can

[GitHub] commons-text issue #54: TEXT-93: RandomStringGenerator accepts a list of val...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54 [](https://:/builds/12097991) Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 97.308% when pulling **f9177e204d608e7fa708d57fabf0029746f7774a

[GitHub] commons-rng pull request #3: Rng 38

GitHub user C0rWin opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/3 Rng 38 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/C0rWin/commons-rng RNG-38 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the

Re: [RNG] Pending issues

​Hi, Can you please take a look on PRs which suppose to handle both issues? ​ On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Gilles wrote: > Github and Maven experts, please have a look at the > following issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-38 > ​PR #1: ​

[GitHub] commons-rng issue #3: Rng 38

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/3 [](https://:/builds/12095968) Coverage remained the same at 96.934% when pulling **fc42e1d03ef2232ee243d9a1a7cd2db37b22ba14 on

[GitHub] commons-rng pull request #4: Rng 31

GitHub user C0rWin opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/4 Rng 31 Maven assembly plugin is not able to produce checksums while assembles artifacts, added checksum artifact which will generate checksums by running ``` mvn clean

[GitHub] commons-rng issue #3: Rng 38

Github user C0rWin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/3 reverify --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: TEXT-77 | String palindrome API

> On Jun 22, 2017, at 4:38 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > +1 agreed with Emmanuel, better we park/close this issue for now. Its very > trivial and can be pull whenever there will be actual requirement. > > Regards, > Amey > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, 1:50 PM Emmanuel Bourg