Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/8
No objections so far, will merge it tomorrow after reviewing the code once
more :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user kinow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54#discussion_r123874569
--- Diff: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/text/RandomStringGenerator.java
---
@@ -76,23 +78,29 @@
private final TextRandomProvider random;
Github user ameyjadiye commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54#discussion_r123877950
--- Diff: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/text/RandomStringGenerator.java
---
@@ -76,23 +78,29 @@
private final TextRandomProvider random;
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54
[![Coverage
Status](https://:/builds/12116448/badge)](https://:/builds/12116448)
Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 97.305% when pulling
**9db77088ecc557c2f209dd36972746d6de8dfc4a
Hi Matt,
what is your opinion in this topic (targeting Java 8)
Benedikt
Matt Benson schrieb am Sa. 24. Juni 2017 um 19:18:
> If we want to repurpose functor for Java 8 then I imagine we'd just
> use their interfaces, for the most part. So the API module would
> indeed
Hi,
> Am 16.06.2017 um 13:03 schrieb Matt Benson :
>
> Yes, the point of the API module was to define the functional interfaces
> separately from the utility code around them; particularly pre-Java 8,
> these could be used apart from the utility code from the core.
Since we
Should changes related to the setup and handling of checkstyle then be
done for Commons as a whole?
Oliver
(No P.S.)
Am 23.06.2017 um 21:19 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> I
>
> P.S.
>
> Agree
>
> P.P.S.
>
> With
>
> P.P.P.S.
>
> you!
>
> Gary
>
> On Jun 23, 2017 10:28, "Simon Spero"
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/8
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Hi Simon et al
I'm not sure what we are using Travis CI for in the first place. Maybe
we can minimize build time by reducing the build to the utter minimum
required to achieve that - whatever that is?
Honestly I don't see anything we couldn't do with our Jenkins
installation as well. Maybe