The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce Apache Compress 1.26.0.
Apache Commons Compress defines an API for working with compression
and archive formats. These include bzip2, gzip, pack200, LZMA, XZ,
Snappy, traditional Unix Compress, DEFLATE, DEFLATE64, LZ4, Brotli,
Zstandard and ar,
+1 - all looks good
> On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.0 based on RC1
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons Compress 1.25.0 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons
Due to important changes delivered by this release, which will be
detailed here ASAP, I am abbreviating the voting period from 72 to 24
hours.
This vote thread passes with the following binding vote:
+1 Bruno Kinoshita
+1 Gary Gregory
+1 Rob Tompkins
In addition, the following non-binding votes
Let's move the ecosystem forward :-)
Cheers,
Martijn
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 05:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> To use a new Jena version, we would require Java 11.
>
> Raise your hand if this would be a deal breaker for you and why.
>
> Raise your hand to say hi or anything else ;-)
>
> See:
>
> -
+1
Since the project is created on top of libs like Jena, exactly to provide a
common interface go all these libs, I think the simplest is to always go
with the minimum thay works with every lib supported.
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, 08:23 Martijn Verburg,
wrote:
> Let's move the ecosystem forward
My +1
Gary
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:14 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.0 based on RC1
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons Compress 1.25.0 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons Compress
Meta issue: the use of direct git commits without PRs or code review
makes releases harder to review.
Specific issues:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/commit/9f2f97925fdb52b5a3a32da6337ea1f113a3be82
is wonky and rates a -1 from me. An encoding error is not necessarily
an I/O error,
* checked the zip and tar.gz match the sha512sum above
* checked the zip and tar.gz match the code at the tag
* checked they were signed with 2DB4F1EF0FA761ECC4EA935C86FDC7E2A11262CB
* built with 'mvn clean install'
* checked the built commons-compress-1.26.0.pom was bit-by-bit identical to
the
+1, binding
Build is OK
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.9, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 1:22 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> Meta issue: the use of direct git commits without PRs or code review
> makes releases harder to review.
Hello Elliotte,
Meta issue:
- This project uses CTR, not RTC. We welcome PRs but do not _require_
them of project committers.
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 9:51 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> > There seem to have been a lot of needless deprecations of constructors
> > and replacement with builder patterns.
>
> The use of the builder pattern avoids constructor inflation. For
> example, we had fourteen (14) constructors for ZipFile,
The problem with CTR (Commit Then Review) instead of RTC (Review Then
Commit) is that CTR too often turns into Commit Never Review. The
problem with RTC is that it slows code velocity.
For major projects at the base of a lot of the Java ecosystem like
many Apache Commons libraries, I'm willing to
Hi there,
i think I would like to use commons-rdf, but not with the old Jena
version. So here is a PR for a new version. I have no idea about osgi
and jena doesn't seem to support it anymore. so I just used the non osgi
dependency.
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/196
Fredy
Hello Fredy,
This change requires a bump of the project requirement from Java 8 to 11.
We need to decide here if this is acceptable. OK by me.
Gary
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 1:36 PM Fred Hauschel wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> i think I would like to use commons-rdf, but not with the old Jena
>
To use a new Jena version, we would require Java 11.
Raise your hand if this would be a deal breaker for you and why.
Raise your hand to say hi or anything else ;-)
See:
- the thread [RDF] New Jena Version
- the PR https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/196
Gary
15 matches
Mail list logo
