Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

Here’s my +1 (non-binding). > On Mar 6, 2017, at 8:25 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0 (from RC1). > > Tag name: >commons-text-1.0-RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag > -v') > > Tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

gt;>>> I have never been a RM, but maybe generate new artefacts with the >>>> corrected text files, then release it and send the notes to the announce >>>> e-mail? >>>> Users can trace the reason for the changes in your commit message and here >>>> i

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

>>> From: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@apache.org> >>> To: dev@commons.apache.org >>> Sent: Saturday, 11 March 2017 2:12 PM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1 >>> >>> The vote can pass with the following (in order of a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

...@apache.org> >> To: dev@commons.apache.org >> Sent: Saturday, 11 March 2017 2:12 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1 >> >> The vote can pass with the following (in order of appearance): >> >> Bruno P. Kinoshita: +1 >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

I’ll add my +1 (non-binding) here. > On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > +1 > > Builds fine with my compiler zoo incl. Java 9. > > Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0 (from RC1). >> >> Tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

nd the notes to the announce > e-mail? > Users can trace the reason for the changes in your commit message and here > in the vote thread. > CheersBruno > From: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@apache.org> > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, 11 March 2017 2:12 PM >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

tom...@apache.org> To: dev@commons.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 11 March 2017 2:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1 The vote can pass with the following (in order of appearance): Bruno P. Kinoshita: +1 Oliver Heger: +1 Jörg Schaible: +1. Personally, I’m in the +/-

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

The vote can pass with the following (in order of appearance): Bruno P. Kinoshita: +1 Oliver Heger: +1 Jörg Schaible: +1. Personally, I’m in the +/- 0 area for the reasons that Oliver and Sebb stated. I’m entirely willing to re-build the candidate to get a “spotless” 1.0 release. Does anyone

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

+1 Builds fine with my compiler zoo incl. Java 9. Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0 (from RC1). > > Tag name: >commons-text-1.0-RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag > -v') > > Tag URL: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

Hi, build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10, also the site build with Java 1.8. Artifacts and site look good. I did not find any other problems than already reported (wrong version in release notes and one missing license header in RAT report). One minor point: Shouldn't the 1.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0 based on RC1

[ X ] +1 Release it. Builds OK on Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-11T05:41:47+13:00) Maven home: /opt/maven Java version: 1.8.0_121, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS