Re: svn commit: r1890412 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/security/cvejsontohtml.py

2021-06-03 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 03/06/2021 à 08:31, jaillet...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jailletc36 Date: Thu Jun 3 06:31:44 2021 New Revision: 1890412 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1890412=rev Log: Use natural order sorting, so that 2.4.9 is after 2.4.10 (trick found on

Broken: apache/httpd#1667 (2.4.x - 59393dd)

2021-06-03 Thread Travis CI
Build Update for apache/httpd - Build: #1667 Status: Broken Duration: 19 mins and 23 secs Commit: 59393dd (2.4.x) Author: Eric Covener Message: correct CVE year git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x@1890439

Re: Broken: apache/httpd#1667 (2.4.x - 59393dd)

2021-06-03 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 6/3/21 7:23 PM, Travis CI wrote: > apache > > / > > httpd > > > > branch icon2.4.x > > build has failed > Build #1667 was broken >

Re: Broken: apache/httpd#1667 (2.4.x - 59393dd)

2021-06-03 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:27 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Looking at the stack trace, would we need to call apr_setup_signal_thread() > (if we have APR_THREADS) before we run > ap_run_child_init and unblock all signals afterwards in case one of the init > child hooks creates threads like

Re: Broken: apache/httpd#1667 (2.4.x - 59393dd)

2021-06-03 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 6/3/21 10:36 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:27 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> Looking at the stack trace, would we need to call apr_setup_signal_thread() >> (if we have APR_THREADS) before we run >> ap_run_child_init and unblock all signals afterwards in case one of the