Re: Failing test t/apache/pr64339.t

Am 03.04.24 um 09:52 schrieb Joe Orton: On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 08:46:46PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: This could be due to none of these happening: - mod_mime didn't send a charset from backend - no BOM - no xml2EncDefault (8859-1 effectively by default) on frontend To make the conf match the

Participate in the ASF 25th Anniversary Campaign

Hi everyone, As part of The ASF’s 25th anniversary campaign[1], we will be celebrating projects and communities in multiple ways. We invite all projects and contributors to participate in the following ways: * Individuals - submit your first contribution:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:16 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > > Am 03.04.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Eric Covener : > > > > Hi all, > > > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of > 2.4.x...) > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > >

Re: mod_systemd: refactor to get rid of libsystemd dependency?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi there, > > in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also > reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in > mod_systemd (thus loading libsystemd and all of its dependencies), but >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

> I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59: my +1 (AIX/xlc/ppc64) Only familiar t/ssl/proxy.t client auth issues with a openssl11 server

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

> Am 03.04.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Eric Covener : > > Hi all, > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 08:26:09AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59: > [X] +1:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On 4/3/24 14:26, Eric Covener wrote: Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release this

Re: mod_systemd: refactor to get rid of libsystemd dependency?

On 02 Apr 2024, at 11:25, Rainer Jung wrote: > in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also > reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in mod_systemd > (thus loading libsystemd and all of its dependencies), but instead taking the >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On 4/3/24 14:26, Eric Covener wrote: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Build and tested in fedora 39 and windows server 2019 (VS17 2022 Cmake). -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59:

Re: Failing test t/apache/pr64339.t

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 08:46:46PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: > This could be due to none of these happening: > - mod_mime didn't send a charset from backend > - no BOM > - no xml2EncDefault (8859-1 effectively by default) on frontend > > To make the conf match the test code, this works for me to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

Thanks! Am 03.04.24 um 21:13 schrieb Eric Covener: On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:03 PM Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rainer Jung wrote: Minor nit: the format of the SHA hash files has changes. Example: 2.4.58:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:03 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > > > > Minor nit: the format of the SHA hash files has changes. Example: > > > > 2.4.58: > > > > fa16d72a078210a54c47dd5bef2f8b9b8a01d94909a51453956b3ec6442ea4c5 > > *httpd-2.4.58.tar.bz2 >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

+1 CentOS 6 CentOS 7 AlmaLinux 8 AlmaLinux 9 Ubuntu 20 Ubuntu 22 Thanks for RM’n. Regards, Cory McIntire | Release Manager cory.mcint...@webpros.com | cPanel – a webpros company From: Eric Covener Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 at 07:26 To: Apache HTTP

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On 03 Apr 2024, at 13:26, Eric Covener wrote: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! +1 on RHEL9. Regards, Graham --

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:26 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! All good from my testing on debian(s). Thanks Eric!

Community over Code EU 2024: Start planning your trip!

[Note: You're receiving this email because you are subscribed to one or more project dev@ mailing lists at the Apache Software Foundation.] Dear community, We hope you are doing great, are you ready for Community Over Code EU? Check out the featured sessions, get your tickets with special

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

Minor nit: the format of the SHA hash files has changes. Example: 2.4.58: fa16d72a078210a54c47dd5bef2f8b9b8a01d94909a51453956b3ec6442ea4c5 *httpd-2.4.58.tar.bz2 2.4.59: SHA2-256(httpd-2.4.59-rc1.tar.bz2)= ec51501ec480284ff52f637258135d333230a7d229c3afa6f6c2f9040e321323 I need to see how

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > > Minor nit: the format of the SHA hash files has changes. Example: > > 2.4.58: > > fa16d72a078210a54c47dd5bef2f8b9b8a01d94909a51453956b3ec6442ea4c5 > *httpd-2.4.58.tar.bz2 > > 2.4.59: > > SHA2-256(httpd-2.4.59-rc1.tar.bz2)= >