2 points of observation below:
- The documentation that we link to on the ibatis.apache.org website
is not current. Actually, it is quite old. I would fix this myself,
but, I'm not aware of the process of getting it where it needs to be
and whether we are still using sourceforge to distribute the
All,so we at IBM and more specifically Lotus would like to use iBatis for Java's data mapper capabilities in a future release of an IBM / Lotus collaboration product. We, the developers, are excited about this and during our preliminary usage it has worked extremely well for us. However in order
Hi Robert,
Yes, every Committer on this list signed a CLA.
http://ibatis.apache.org/team.html
Cheers,
Clinton
On 2/7/06, rob yates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,so we at IBM and more specifically Lotus would like to use
iBatis for Java's data mapper capabilities in a future release of an
IBM /
And to add further comfort, we are very careful when accepting code
contributions and patches from non-committers. We either don't
use it, or the contributor must file a CLA.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 2/7/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Clinton says, all the committers have CLAs on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-53?page=comments#action_12365453 ]
Michael Fagan commented on IBATIS-53:
-
A sample solution for this issue can be find at:
The documentation exists in SVN as an Open Office document. For some
reason it has not been converted to PDF and posted.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/trunk/java/docs/iBATIS-SqlMaps-2.sxw
Brandon
On 2/7/06, VanderArk, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there more up to date
I was thinking about updating the TypeHandlerFactory to ignore the
case of a type alias. Is anyone opposed to this idea.
This way both String and string would map to java.lang.String. I
can not think of any reason why this would be a bad idea.
Nathan
On this same note...
When are we going to start hosting the binaries and documentation on
apache and get off the dreadful SF site?
Nathan
On Feb 7, 2006, at 7:40 AM, Brandon Goodin wrote:
2 points of observation below:
- The documentation that we link to on the ibatis.apache.org website
1) Documentation: Yes it's old. I'm not sure if the OO doc
in SVN is any newer...I don't think I've updated it. Maybe
Richard will update it for us.
2) Hosting: Yes, we should move all of our downloadables to
Apache. It's both easier to deploy, and easier to download.
3) JIRA: I'll look into
I made changes to the SVN documentation a while back. I added docs for
new features that have been added. I thought we released the docs with
each release of the API. Anyway, just so ya know that there have been
updates made to the SVN docs.
Brandon
On 2/7/06, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like that idea VERY MUCH. Its one of those things that I always get
annoyed at but never think to change. :)
Brandon
On 2/7/06, Nathan Maves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about updating the TypeHandlerFactory to ignore the
case of a type alias. Is anyone opposed to this idea.
Cool I will take care of it and make it my first commit. That way I
can really say that I work on an apache product :)
On Feb 7, 2006, at 7:28 PM, Brandon Goodin wrote:
I like that idea VERY MUCH. Its one of those things that I always get
annoyed at but never think to change. :)
Brandon
On 2/7/06, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Documentation: Yes it's old. I'm not sure if the OO doc in SVN is any
newer...I don't think I've updated it. Maybe Richard will update it for us.
I was thinking the same thing...c'mon Ric, step up the plate. ;-)
Larry
13 matches
Mail list logo
