Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
14. Close the vote 15. Commit the finalized release notes 16. Commit the updated doap 17. Add the release to the dist $ cd ~/tmp $ svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/maven/maven-3 maven-dist $ cd maven-dist $ mkdir -p 3.5.0/{binaries,source} $ for ext in tar.gz zip ; do ( cd

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.5.0

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1: Mark Derricutt, Dejan Stojadinović, Grzegorz Grzybek, Petr Široký, Igor Fedorenko (binding), Anders Hammar, Manfred Moser, Karl Heinz Marbaise (binding), Tibor Digana (binding), Fred Cooke, Raphael Ackermann, Hervé Boutemy (binding), Olivier

Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
23. Mark the version in JIRA as released On 7 April 2017 at 09:40, Stephen Connolly wrote: > 14. Close the vote > 15. Commit the finalized release notes > 16. Commit the updated doap > 17. Add the release to the dist > > $ cd ~/tmp > $ svn co

JDK 9 Developer Preview is now available on java.net

2017-04-07 Thread Rory O'Donnell
Hi Robert , *JDK 9 Developer Preview is now available on java.net [1] * Developer Preview milestone: - A reasonably stable build suitable for broad testing by the developer community is available. JDK 9 Builds 163 and higher include all planned features. *Attention annotation

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Petr Široký
Hello, thanks for the fast turnaround. I am afraid I've hit another issue (or maybe misconfiguration?). I was trying to use -Dmaven.surefire.debug in the following project: https://github.com/psiroky/surefire-2.20-debug-reproducer $ mvn clean install -s settings.xml -Dmaven.surefire.debug The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Petr Široký
One more difference (bug?) I found: When I do: final URL parentUrl = this.getClass().getResource("/"); System.out.println(parentUrl); the output is 'file:/home/psiroky/tmp/surefire-2.20-debug/target/test-classes//' -- note the duplicated slash at the end. I've done the same with 2.19.1 and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Tibor Digana
This is related to ForkConfiguration. There is path created for the manifest. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Petr Široký wrote: > One more difference (bug?) I found: > > When I do: > > final URL parentUrl = this.getClass().getResource("/"); >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Tibor Digana
Good point. The PING chcking should be disabled when JMX observes debug mode. See implementation in JUnit sources. The same is there. Can you open pull request with a fix? On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Petr Široký wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for the fast turnaround. > >

[GitHub] maven pull request #112: Fix snapshot regular expression

2017-04-07 Thread kevin-canadian
GitHub user kevin-canadian opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/112 Fix snapshot regular expression The snapshot regular expression should only match an explicit period. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Petr Široký
I'try to take a look. However, I have no prior experience with jUnit or surefire sources, so it might take a while until I have something. Thanks, Petr On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:22 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > Good point. The PING chcking should be disabled when JMX

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.5.0 Released

2017-04-07 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you for the new release! Gary On Apr 7, 2017 2:07 PM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > The Apache Maven team would like to announce the release of Apache Maven > 3.5.0. > > You can download the appropriate sources etc. from the download page > >

[ANN] Apache Maven 3.5.0 Released

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
The Apache Maven team would like to announce the release of Apache Maven 3.5.0. You can download the appropriate sources etc. from the download page http://maven.apache.org/download.cgi Notable changes === - ANSI colors added to the console output - Fix various bugs in mvn scripts

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.5.0 Released

2017-04-07 Thread Chas Honton
Congratulations on a successful release! Thanks to all of the maven core team for your work, particularly for the willingness to abandon 3.4 and reset to a more iterative approach. Thanks, Chas > On Apr 7, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > The Apache Maven

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

2017-04-07 Thread Fuud
Github user Fuud commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 any updates? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

Re: [GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

2017-04-07 Thread Tibor Digana
Sorry, I realized this was pending issue after release Vote started. Do not worry, we will trigger a new version 2.20.1 in two weeks. Something is already in good progress like this, so no reason to wait too long for 2.20.1. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:52 AM, flungo [via Maven] <

Re: is 3.5.1 open for business?

2017-04-07 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I completely agree we need to prove each code change does not break existing integration tests (and I did run the tests locally with my changes, fwiw) -- Regards, Igor On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > I want every issue that changes code (not docs or javadocs) to have

Re: is 3.5.1 open for business?

2017-04-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Igor, Also, does anyone know how to get my JIRA account fixed so I can assign/close/etc bugs? You are not allowed to do? Write an INFRA ticket...in the meantime I or others can help here with that... JIRA says your account does not exist...tried to assign 6210 to you... Looks really

Re: is 3.5.1 open for business?

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
I want every issue that changes code (not docs or javadocs) to have an integration test run before merging. We were trying to get consensus on a process but the debate died without a conclusion On Fri 7 Apr 2017 at 16:21, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > I have two of small-ish

[GitHub] maven issue #112: Fix snapshot regular expression

2017-04-07 Thread khmarbaise
Github user khmarbaise commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/112 First thanks for your pull request but it is really needed that you open a [JIRA ticket ](issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG) and furthermore it would be great if you could offer some unit tests

Re: is 3.5.1 open for business?

2017-04-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Igor, On 07/04/17 17:21, Igor Fedorenko wrote: I have two of small-ish fixes I'd like to submit, so I was wondering if master is open for 3.5.1 changes already or we want to give it little more time in case we need to release any emergency patches. If that's really necessary we can simply

Re: is 3.5.1 open for business?

2017-04-07 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Thank you for quick response, Karl. I'll create feature branches and push proposed fixes there. Is there a preference between apache and github for code review branches? -- Regards, Igor On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Igor, > >> > >> Also, does anyone know

is 3.5.1 open for business?

2017-04-07 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I have two of small-ish fixes I'd like to submit, so I was wondering if master is open for 3.5.1 changes already or we want to give it little more time in case we need to release any emergency patches. Also, what is the general bug fixing protocol now, push to directly to master and be prepared

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Tibor Digana
@Petr Both issues are fixed now. Would you please verify this version from master? I tested on my side. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Petr Široký wrote: > I'try to take a look. However, I have no prior experience with jUnit or > surefire sources, so it might take a

Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
24. Publish the website with https://cms.apache.org/maven/publish 25. Send the announcement email 26. (PMC only) Record the release on https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?maven 27. Tweet the release TODO: 28. Wait for the announcement email to show up on the

Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

2017-04-07 Thread Fred Cooke
Yes, agreed, 30 is a lot, but if you have N artifacts in a dir running sha1sum dir/* and pasting the result raw into the email is not difficult. Less so than formatting the two, probably. On 8 April 2017 at 09:13, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 7 April 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Tibor Digana
The CI build will finish after 3 hours. Then the SNAPSHOT version will be in Maven Central. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > is 2.20-SNAPSHOT up to date? that is only quick way I can test > > Thanks > > -D > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Tibor Digana

Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

2017-04-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 7 April 2017 at 22:10, Fred Cooke wrote: > Thanks for all of your hard work on this, much appreciated! > > A little feedback for 3.5.1 (not helping with 3.5.0): checksums for the > binaries too, not just the source. > > checksums are in the staging repo and on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

2017-04-07 Thread Dan Tran
is 2.20-SNAPSHOT up to date? that is only quick way I can test Thanks -D On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > @Petr > Both issues are fixed now. Would you please verify this version from > master? I tested on my side. > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at

Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

2017-04-07 Thread Fred Cooke
Thanks for all of your hard work on this, much appreciated! A little feedback for 3.5.1 (not helping with 3.5.0): checksums for the binaries too, not just the source. That's it. :-) On 8 April 2017 at 09:05, Stephen Connolly wrote: > 24. Publish the website