Re: Maven Compiler Plugin Release 3.7.1--

2018-07-23 Thread Naman Nigam
+1 (to know why is the release held) Mostly a follower of this mailing list though, yet I can sense where this is coming from and I do agree there are already a lot of fixes that 3.7.1 can come up with to solve for the community unless 3.8.0 is really really near to release or we are not seeking

Maven Compiler Plugin Release 3.7.1--

2018-07-23 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I want to know if there are objections to make a new release of Maven Compiler Plugin cause it already has much fixes in there which seemed to be needed in the community.. If have more fixes we should make another release afterwards.. WDYT ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: maven-compiler-plugin release

2017-08-15 Thread Robert Scholte
I need to work an the plexus-java performance issue and also think of a way to preserve the extra JPMS arguments used during compilation so they can be available at runtime as well (= MCOMPILER-296). As far as I know these are the final open issues required to have a complete Java 9

maven-compiler-plugin release

2017-08-15 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Robert, would you think we should do another release for maven-compiler-plugin ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Maven Compiler Plugin Release

2015-03-23 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, so based that no one raised his hand i will continue and start the release within this week... If you have objections or things which should be part of the release please raise a hand as soon as possible so i can hold on... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 3/15/15 11:41 PM, Karl

Maven Compiler Plugin Release

2015-03-15 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I just wan't to cut a release for maven-compiler-plugin version 3.3 within the next week currently having only 4 issues solved there...Is there something else which should be part of it? I think this release would be the last Maven 2.2.1 supporting release... Kind regards Karl

Re: Cutting another maven-compiler-plugin release to set the default source/target to 1.5

2010-04-11 Thread Milos Kleint
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Brett Porter wrote: [...] though for your purposes it might be more expedient to put the configuration in the 3.0 super POM? -1, it's unlucky when builds depend on the version of Maven being used, this

Re: Cutting another maven-compiler-plugin release to set the default source/target to 1.5

2010-04-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: [...] though for your purposes it might be more expedient to put the configuration in the 3.0 super POM? -1, it's unlucky when builds depend on the version of Maven being used, this should not be be the norm. Ideally, plugin behavior should only be a function of the

Cutting another maven-compiler-plugin release to set the default source/target to 1.5

2010-04-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
The defaults are currently set in the plexus-compiler-javac component (to source=1.3 and target=1.1) and not in the maven-compiler-plugin. I would just like to set the default in the AbstractCompilerMojo and be done with it. This way when we release 3.0-beta-1 the default source/target will be

Re: Cutting another maven-compiler-plugin release to set the default source/target to 1.5

2010-04-09 Thread Brett Porter
This is the issue to update when you do: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-80 I agree it should be done, though for your purposes it might be more expedient to put the configuration in the 3.0 super POM? - Brett On 10/04/2010, at 10:58 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: The defaults are

Re: Cutting another maven-compiler-plugin release to set the default source/target to 1.5

2010-04-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:05 PM, Brett Porter wrote: This is the issue to update when you do: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-80 I agree it should be done, though for your purposes it might be more expedient to put the configuration in the 3.0 super POM? I think this would