[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868263#action_12868263 ] Bill Kuker commented on DIRMINA-382: I am sorry, it came from the SVN change

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868236#action_12868236 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on DIRMINA-382 at 5/17/10 12:10 PM: --

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868292#action_12868292 ] Bill Kuker commented on DIRMINA-382: That's where it came from. It lives on at

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868354#action_12868354 ] Bill Kuker commented on DIRMINA-382: My last link is to trunk, right? It lists:

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868354#action_12868354 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on DIRMINA-382 at 5/17/10 3:20 PM: -

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868354#action_12868354 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on DIRMINA-382 at 5/17/10 3:29 PM: -

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868686#action_12868686 ] Bill Kuker commented on DIRMINA-382: I think that this ticket should be reopened (or a

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-382) Provide a close() method that doesn't close the connection until all messages are written.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881832#action_12881832 ] Bill Kuker commented on DIRMINA-382: So is there a new JIRA for this? I am not sure

[jira] [Created] (SSHD-117) Ignore keepal...@jcraft.com in addition to keepal...@openssh.com

Ignore keepal...@jcraft.com in addition to keepal...@openssh.com Key: SSHD-117 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-117 Project: MINA SSHD Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (SSHD-121) Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for SshServer, TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport

Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for SshServer, TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport -- Key: SSHD-121 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-121

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-117) Ignore keepal...@jcraft.com in addition to keepal...@openssh.com

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-117: Attachment: SSHD-117.patch Here is a patch including these changes. I do not expect it is really needed for

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-121) Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for SshServer, TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-121: Description: I would like to make it possible for applications embedding Mina SSHD to have greater control

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-121) Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for SshServer, TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-121: Attachment: SSHD-121-Proposal.patch Here is a patch that covers this suggestion. I didn't go with the

[jira] [Created] (SSHD-123) TcpipForward race condition deadlock on client disconnect.

TcpipForward race condition deadlock on client disconnect. Key: SSHD-123 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-123 Project: MINA SSHD Issue Type: Bug Affects

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-123) TcpipForward race condition deadlock on client disconnect.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-123: Attachment: SSHD_123_Test.java This is a test that reliably exposes the problem, at least on my system. It

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-123) TcpipForward race condition deadlock on client disconnect.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-123: Attachment: SSHD-123.patch This patch fixes the problem for me. In TcpipForwardSupport.sessionCreated() I

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (SSHD-123) TcpipForward race condition deadlock on client disconnect.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13022738#comment-13022738 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on SSHD-123 at 4/21/11 1:19 PM: -- This

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-121) Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-121: Summary: Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport (was: Add Factories

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-121) Add Factories to create IoAcceptors TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-121: Summary: Add Factories to create IoAcceptors TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport (was: Add Factories to

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-121) Add Factories to create IoAcceptors for TcpipForwardSupport X11ForwardSupport

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13459823#comment-13459823 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-121: - Yes, here is why: I use this to restrict the IPs that

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16057359#comment-16057359 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-85: I solemnly swear I am going to kill this bug... Narrowing down the problem,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16055741#comment-16055741 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on SSHD-85 at 6/20/17 1:20 PM: - [~lgoldstein] I understand

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16055905#comment-16055905 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-85: I have a "NOT A FIX" fix The following change to the server makes every

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16048266#comment-16048266 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-85: Here is a more minimal reproduction... https://github.com/bkuker/sshd-85

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-85: --- Affects Version/s: 1.4.0 > Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent >

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-85: --- Description: When I am forwarding connections from a Client to a port on the SSH Server through the SSH Client

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-85: --- Description: When I am forwarding connections from a Client to a port on the SSH Server through the SSH Client

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16052960#comment-16052960 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-85: If the socket is not writable sshd waits to write the data, like it should,

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16052959#comment-16052959 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-85: The behavior of the server is simplified, but more or less identical to, an

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker updated SSHD-85: --- Affects Version/s: 1.6.0 > Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent >

[jira] [Reopened] (SSHD-85) Port Forward closes connection before all bytes are sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Kuker reopened SSHD-85: As of 1.4.0 this issue still exists. Please take a look and let me know how to help you reproduce it. > Port

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16460874#comment-16460874 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - Hello, I am pretty certain now that the line

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16462632#comment-16462632 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - [~gnt] Thanks very much for your help, there is an issue with your patch.

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436082#comment-16436082 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - I am hitting this issue too. [~lgoldstein], {quote}{{the number of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16438353#comment-16438353 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on SSHD-721 at 4/14/18 2:10 PM: -- I am zeroing in on

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16438353#comment-16438353 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - I am zeroing in on reproducing it... (In the following steps "web

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16438353#comment-16438353 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on SSHD-721 at 4/14/18 2:12 PM: -- I am zeroing in on

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16437233#comment-16437233 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - I am uncertain of the answers to these. My full project includes

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16437253#comment-16437253 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on SSHD-721 at 4/13/18 12:36 PM: --- You know, as I am

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16437253#comment-16437253 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - You know, as I am waking up this morning, I do remember noticing that in

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16437253#comment-16437253 ] Bill Kuker edited comment on SSHD-721 at 4/13/18 12:34 PM: --- You know, as I am

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16438468#comment-16438468 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - [~johnnyv] That is correct. I do not think switching over to an unbounded

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-721) deadlock: all nio workers wait to be woken up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16439336#comment-16439336 ] Bill Kuker commented on SSHD-721: - [~gnt], thanks so much, that patch seems to have a positive effect (/)