On 18/09/2011 02:21, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch
2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk
to a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as
unmaintained. The arguments for / against
Here is my vote :
+1 : Shelve 2.0 and move 1.4 to trunk
Julien
On 18 September 2011 10:21, Julien Nioche lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch
2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk
My vote is thumbs down: -1
I am only involved in Nutch 2.0 and that would be put the back burner...
Please read these articles if you struggle with using Nutch 2.0, and give
feedback so that we can improve the doc/code/architecture.
Nutch 2.0 (trunk)
Hi Alexis,
A few comments below :
My vote is thumbs down: -1
I am only involved in Nutch 2.0 and that would be put the back burner...
It has never left it so that's not much of a change :-) Nutch 2.0 (and GORA)
has had more than a year to gather momentum and it hasn't.
More seriously, as
I'm glad to hear that there at least 2 people in the community that
do business in their field and proudly use a Nutch-based crawler
together with
Cassandra to store the data through Gora. That would not have been
possible with Nutch 1.x version.
what about to drop Gora, because it is
Note to all: please use the [DISCUSS] thread format to discuss the VOTE, and
please don't reply all to the VOTE thread and sully up the VOTE tallies with
discussion.
Radim,
Thanks for your email. What you propose has been suggested as an option.
The best way to help see it happen sooner
Hi Radim,
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
The nutchgora branch will still be there, and if there's a desire to
have a nutchcassandra or nutchhbase pure branch, and you have some spare
cycles to help see it come about, we would welcome it.
it needs to be done in more
+1
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch
2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to
a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained.
The arguments for / against can be found in the thread I
On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch 2.0,
I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a
separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. The
Hi,
[X ] +1 : Shelve 2.0 and move 1.4 to trunk
[] 0 : No opinion
[] -1 : Bad idea. Please give justification.
Thank you
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the
-1
I don't want to mark release 2.0 as unmaintained. Cassandra backend
works really well for us and fixed performance problems with hadoop
database. Instead of moving it out trunk, recruit more ppl should come
and fix open problems. don't give up.
Hi Radim,
Thanks for your feedback. Just to dispel the thought that this VOTE will
remove the Nutch-with-Gora version of SVN, it won't remove it (not that it
could
ever fully remove it anyways since SVN is a version control system it
Nutch-with-Gora
will always be around in some form or
+1
On 09/18/2011 04:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of
Nutch 2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from
the trunk to a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0
as unmaintained. The arguments for
13 matches
Mail list logo
