[racket-dev] Call for help testing course binaries written in Racket

2012-08-30 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
Hello Racketeers! Shriram and I are running a course this fall with a significant online component (http://www.cs.brown.edu/courses/cs173/2012/OnLine/). We'll start distributing course software to well over a thousand students next Friday. We're (of course) writing the course software in

Re: [racket-dev] Call for help testing course binaries written in Racket

2012-09-08 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
tools for making this work so smoothly, and thanks to you all! On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Joe Gibbs Politz j...@cs.brown.edu wrote: Hello Racketeers! Shriram and I are running a course this fall with a significant online component (http://www.cs.brown.edu/courses/cs173/2012/OnLine/). We'll

[racket-dev] check-match?

2012-11-19 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
A small suggestion: I used roughly this macro (credit Jonah Kagan) recently to help me write some tests for parsing code that agnostic to which source position is generated in the parse: (define-syntax test/match (syntax-rules () [(test/match actual expected pred) (let ([actual-val

Re: [racket-dev] check-match?

2012-11-19 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
nice! (It should begin with check not test tho, right?) Robby On Monday, November 19, 2012, Matthias Felleisen wrote: That is cute. Why don't you just create a pull request and Ryan can integrate it into rackunit? -- Matthias On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Joe Gibbs Politz wrote

Re: [racket-dev] check-match?

2012-11-19 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
(? P) = (lambda (x) (match x [P true] [_ false])) I like this quite a bit. It wouldn't be crazy to add it as match-pred(icate) right next to match-lambda, match-let, and friends (

Re: [racket-dev] check-match?

2012-11-19 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
: I think it is better to have a check-match since that way people are more likely to find it. Robby On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Joe Gibbs Politz j...@cs.brown.edu wrote: (? P) = (lambda (x) (match x [P true] [_ false])) I like this quite a bit. It wouldn't be crazy to add

Re: [racket-dev] check-match?

2012-11-19 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
I think I've successfully sent a thingie to you: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/171 Let me know if I Did It Wrong. This is the first time I've clicked the Pull Request button on Github. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Joe Gibbs Politz j...@cs.brown.edu wrote: Gotcha. match-pred can

Re: [racket-dev] check-match?

2012-11-21 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote: I'm not sure how to find the right incantation to pull this down, but this commit looks good to push to our repo. Robby On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Joe Gibbs Politz j...@cs.brown.edu wrote: I think I've successfully sent

Re: [racket-dev] How to avoid to modify .gitignore when pull request

2012-12-13 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
Unfortunately I don't have his email, so I hope he'll read this or perhaps someone here can forward this to him. Got it, I'll add to the post this evening. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] How to avoid to modify .gitignore when pull request

2012-12-13 Thread Joe Gibbs Politz
I was following your blog too, haha. Glad to hear it was useful! I've updated the post on the blog. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev