RE: Proposal: Sundown Shale-Tiles

2008-01-08 Thread eavilesa
Petrelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: martes, 08 de enero de 2008 17:54 Para: dev@shale.apache.org Asunto: Re: Proposal: Sundown Shale-Tiles 2008/1/8, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I agree and that is why shale clay exists [1]. It has actually been around longer than facelets but just

Re: Proposal: Sundown Shale-Tiles

2008-01-07 Thread Greg Reddin
On Jan 4, 2008 8:40 PM, Gregg Leichtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I consider this important, since I use Tiles and I want to and currently am using JSF 1.2, since it resolves the interweaving problem among other things. Granted, I could potentially move to Clay, but I came from Struts and I am

Re: Proposal: Sundown Shale-Tiles

2008-01-04 Thread Gregg Leichtman
I brought this up, since the Shale developers might want to more carefully consider the decision to drop Tiles support along the way to MyFaces integration or at least consider how Tiles/JSF 1.2 support will be managed going forward under the MyFaces umbrella. It has been my experience that to

Re: Proposal: Sundown Shale-Tiles

2008-01-03 Thread Greg Reddin
On Jan 2, 2008 6:25 PM, Gregg Leichtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the MyFaces view handler support JSF 1.2? I'm ashamed to say I don't know what's changed in the ViewHandler API between 1.1 and 1.2. If there are changes I suspect the current view handler from MyFaces or Shale wouldn't be