Re: stdcxx issue 1058
Hi Stefan, Stefan Teleman stefan.tele...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: On 08/31/12 13:14, Stefan Teleman wrote: In June this year I committed r1353821 to trunk which fixes stdcxx-1058. I have the patches for 1058 ready to commit to branches (4.2.x and 4.3.x). OK to go? The patch looks ok to me. What seems to be the problem? +1 I also had a initial look at the patch. Looks OK, I looked at the other occurrences of operator delete to see if we are not doing the same thing. -- Wojciech Meyer http://danmey.org
Re: stdcxx issue 1058
On 08/31/12 13:14, Stefan Teleman wrote: In June this year I committed r1353821 to trunk which fixes stdcxx-1058. I have the patches for 1058 ready to commit to branches (4.2.x and 4.3.x). OK to go? The patch looks ok to me. What seems to be the problem? +1 L
Re: stdcxx issue 1058
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: On 08/31/12 13:14, Stefan Teleman wrote: In June this year I committed r1353821 to trunk which fixes stdcxx-1058. I have the patches for 1058 ready to commit to branches (4.2.x and 4.3.x). OK to go? The patch looks ok to me. What seems to be the problem? +1 Done. trunk revision 1353821 branches/4.2.x revision 1379523 branches/4.3.x revision 1379520 --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
