On 7/1/06, Don Brown (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rename Struts Action 1 to Struts 1
If we are using struts1 and struts2 for the repository folders
(which is fine with me), why are we using 1.x and 2.0 for the
website folders?
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/
* http://struts.apache.org/2.0/
I chose 1.x and 2.0 because I think it fits better with the other archived web
sites. The struts1 and struts2 names are more for internal use and in
particular, struts1 is only used in svn due to the maven workaround. I think
1.x and 2.0, as well as the past 1.2.9 and so on, is easier for the
On 7/5/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I chose 1.x and 2.0 because I think it fits better with the other archived web
sites. The struts1 and struts2 names are more for internal use and in
particular, struts1 is only used in svn due to the maven workaround. I think
1.x and 2.0, as well
A thought occured to me today. If we ever want to share code between struts 1
and struts 2c (ie: locale resolution), having the org.apache.struts package
structure being the neutral place makes sense, with action (1.x) and action2
(2.x) being specific implementations.
Well, not that the
