On 24/07/2019 07:58, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
>
> --- Comment #8 from Oscar Dawson ---
Another idiot blocked and the spam deleted.
FYI, Infra have made some config changes that should reduce the level of
spam.
Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #8 from Oscar Dawson ---
ID generator base is the generation of ID and the component by various kind of
situational forming. The log level succession is also the same criteria in the
link of
On 22/07/2019 07:22, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
>
> --- Comment #8 from Oliver Skene <0ltlj...@besttempmail.com> ---
Spam comment deleted. User disabled.
Mark
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #8 from Oliver Skene <0ltlj...@besttempmail.com> ---
ID generator base is the generation of ID and the component by various kind of
situational forming. The log level succession is also the same criteria in the
link of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #7 from Piotr Chlebda ---
Thanks Mark Thomas for a quick response.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Piotr Chlebda from comment #5)
> 1) Would that be another bug for that ?
Maybe. We need to wait and see if we get any such reports. I'd be surprised to
get such a report where
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Chlebda ---
1) Would that be another bug for that ?
2)I'd like to make sure that my PR was ok, since it was only at trunk (version
9). Are there any requirments for PR for other
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #3 from Coty Sutherland ---
Taking another look at the code around the info message I think we may need to
add another check to see if the delay time is larger than 100 ms. If we make
this a warning message
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Chlebda ---
Hi,
I'm newby as a tomcat contributor and I'd like to take this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
Coty Sutherland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Beginner
---
11 matches
Mail list logo