Distributed OSGi, Dynamic wiring

2009-02-11 Thread Konradi, Philipp
Hi all, I keep an eye on Tuscany already for a longer time. It's definitely a great and very promising framework evolving here. The development goes on at such a high pace that it's not always easy for me to stay updated about the features it supports :-) Currently I'm wondering about two

RE: Distributed OSGi, Dynamic wiring

2009-02-12 Thread Konradi, Philipp
are interested in this area, I would be glad to help. [Konradi, Philipp] Yeah, definitely. Though Tuscany already now supports OSGi contributions (implementation.osgi), I see a lot of advantages in supporting the upcoming Distributed OSGi standard, which defines integration of any middleware into an OSGi

[2.x] Efforts to add JMS support

2009-09-08 Thread Konradi, Philipp
Hi all, I was wondering about the effort to port JMS support from 1.x to the OSGi-based 2.x branch?! It would be great if somebody could provide a rough estimation.. is it rather a matter of 2 days or of 2 weeks? Many thanks in advance! Philipp

RE: [2.x] Efforts to add JMS support

2009-09-09 Thread Konradi, Philipp
Hi ant, our plan is to conduct an evaluation in the first october week. It would be really great if some support for JMS-Binding would be there by that time. Regards, Philipp -Original Message- From: ant elder [mailto:ant.el...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:16

RE: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3297) JMS Binding schema doens't allow custom wireFormats in JMS response element

2009-10-08 Thread Konradi, Philipp
I wasn't aware of this possibility, does it mean one can configure different data formats for request and response messages? Best, Philipp -Original Message- From: ant elder (JIRA) [mailto:d...@tuscany.apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:16 PM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org

RE: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3297) JMS Binding schema doens't allow custom wireFormats in JMS response element

2009-10-10 Thread Konradi, Philipp
Great, thanks for the replies! I've been aware of the possibility to define custom wire formats, but seems like not of all its features :-) -Original Message- From: ant.el...@gmail.com [mailto:ant.el...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of ant elder Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:31 AM To:

RE: binding.jms in SCA Java 2.0 M4 -RC2

2009-11-11 Thread Konradi, Philipp
Are there any workarounds known? From: ant elder [mailto:ant.el...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:21 AM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: binding.jms in SCA Java 2.0 M4 -RC2 Does the JMS binding actually work in an OSGi environment, i thought there were issues with

RE: binding.jms in SCA Java 2.0 M4

2009-11-16 Thread Konradi, Philipp
Yes something like that is definitely needed, but i'm not sure that alone would be enough to get it working. The JMS samples we have use the jndi.properties file to configure the JMS resources and I suspect that wont work as-is in OSGi. AFAIK according to the binding spec JNDi is only one of

RE: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-13 Thread Konradi, Philipp
-...@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloud enabled devices. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Konradi, Philipp philipp.konr...@siemens.commailto:philipp.konr...@siemens.com wrote: That sounds like a great idea and I would be interested to understand better what you exactly mean by SCA clouded embedded