On 7/19/21 2:47 PM, Dov Murik wrote:
> On 19/07/2021 20:28, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 7/6/21 3:55 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
>
>>> +[Defines]
>>> + INF_VERSION= 0x00010005
>>> + BASE_NAME = SevHashesBlobVerifierLib
>
> But is this BASE_NAME okay?
>
> Or
On 19/07/2021 20:28, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 7/6/21 3:55 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
>> Add an implementation for BlobVerifierLib that locates the SEV hashes
>> table and verifies that the calculated hashes of the kernel, initrd, and
>> cmdline blobs indeed match the expected hashes stated in the
On 7/6/21 3:55 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
> Add an implementation for BlobVerifierLib that locates the SEV hashes
> table and verifies that the calculated hashes of the kernel, initrd, and
> cmdline blobs indeed match the expected hashes stated in the hashes
> table.
>
> If there's a missing hash or a
Add an implementation for BlobVerifierLib that locates the SEV hashes
table and verifies that the calculated hashes of the kernel, initrd, and
cmdline blobs indeed match the expected hashes stated in the hashes
table.
If there's a missing hash or a hash mismatch then EFI_ACCESS_DENIED is
returned
