On Monday 25 November 2002 09:46, Andreas Fink wrote:
I think this is quite likely to happen considering the number of
elements we're
going through to get to them (Firewall/VPN/proxy).
Maybe the solution is to use the keep-alive feature, what does kannel
do when
it does not get an
waiting for that. Is it coming in the near future?! Should be done
very simple I guess.
Here is a patch for the infinite loop problem I reported in the SMPP
driver for review. I also added in a reconnect-attempts configuration
variable for control. This is mandated by a number of operators
Hi All,
I'm running kannel 1.2.1 (RH7.3) with Siemens TC35, and I think I've
found another bug in AT2 swap_nibbles handling. The MSB bit is not
correctly swapped because we're using signed char.
Please find below my patch against CVS HEAD:
Index: smsc_at2.c
UDH (both ports and SAR) are defined in WAP-259 (WDP Spec). Port
numbers are
capitulated in appendix 4 (A.4). SI spec is WAP-167 (contains an
example tokenized
SI document). Usually only Content-type is required here (actually
WAP-145 states
that only it is mandatory).
What kind of Siemens
And the bearerbox log ?
Aarno
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100
From: Stipe Tolj
Can we vote for giving Igor commit rights, too ? +1 from me, SAR patch
was very good.
Aarno
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 04:38 AM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Some time ago this problem was reported by Vjacheslav, but the
reason was pointed not correctly.
Actually n7210 sends SDU size, but it
Hi,
I am having a GSM modem and I am trying to send SMS using Hyperterminal. But
the problem is I am getting the message Error while sending the message.
Please help.
On Monday 25 November 2002 09:46, Andreas Fink wrote:
On Montag, November 25, 2002, at 09:37 Uhr, Christophe Teyssier wrote:
Maybe the solution is to use the keep-alive feature, what does kannel
do when
it does not get an answer to a keepalive command? Is the TCP connection
dropped?
i don't think its related to anything.
the char type is a byte sized data storage, and the signed/unsigned behaviour is only
important when casting to different types.
--
Oded Arbel
-Original Message-
From: Sindunata Sudarmaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'm seem to be getting very different udh's generated from test_ppg than
those from the text m-notification-ind that works.
1. Working udh
udh=%06%05%04%0b%84%23%f0
2. Nonworking test_ppg generated UDH(s) [multi-part-message]
[udh:12:0B05040B8423F3000301]
[udh:12:0B05040B8423F3000302]
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:46:51PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
i don't think its related to anything.
the char type is a byte sized data storage, and the signed/unsigned behaviour is
only important when casting to different types.
It matters because of this:
return ( ( byte 15 ) * 10 ) + (
I see, ok. I'll fix, thanks.
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-9-9581711 (116)
+972-67-340014
::..
Fingle's laws for existentialists -
10.If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.
-Original Message-
From: Richard
It matters because of this:
return ( ( byte 15 ) * 10 ) + ( byte >> 4 );
The >> operator is allowed to sign-extend its operand, so that -16
(0xf0h) becomes -1 (0xffh). It won't do this if chars are unsigned,
in which case 0xf0h just becomes 0x0fh.
correct. the other option would be to OR
-Original Message-From: Andreas Fink
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:44
PMTo: Oded ArbelCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: at2
swap_nibbles
It matters because of this:
return ( ( byte 15 ) * 10 ) + ( byte 4 );
The
On Montag, November 25, 2002, at 06:54 Uhr, Oded Arbel wrote:
Yes. will somebody just shoot me where I stand ? will save me lots of trouble ;-)
I shoud have said
return ( ( byte 0x0F ) 4 ) | ( ( byte 0xF0 ) >> 4 );
I'll fix ?
how about this:
#define HI_NIBBLE(a) ( (int)a >> 4
Why
are you casting to int ?
--Oded Arbelm-Wise mobile solutions[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-9-9581711 (116)+972-67-340014
::..Reasons to Run Away 8-"When the DM just watched a LOT of
horror/monster movies"
-Original Message-From: Andreas Fink
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:05:23PM +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
how about this:
#define HI_NIBBLE(a)( (int)a 4 0x0F)
#define LOW_NIBBLE(a) ( (int)a 0x0F)
#define SWAP_NIBBLE(a) (( HI_NIBBLE(a) | (LOW_NIBBLE(a) 4)) 0xFF)
This would work as a macro and has
On Dienstag, November 26, 2002, at 03:21 Uhr, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:05:23PM +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
how about this:
#define HI_NIBBLE(a) ( (int)a >> 4 0x0F)
#define LOW_NIBBLE(a) ( (int)a 0x0F)
#define SWAP_NIBBLE(a) (( HI_NIBBLE(a) | (LOW_NIBBLE(a) 4))
Title: Message
I am connecting to a
CMG SMSC via SMPP. Due to this particular client's setup we had to use a w2k
server instead of a linux server that we usually do. I do not know whether this
is due to the cygwin compile or whether it is an issue on the telco side. Below
is my config and
Title: Message
I am connecting to a
CMG SMSC via SMPP. Due to this particular client's setup we had to use a w2k
server instead of a linux server that we usually do. I do not know whether this
is due to the cygwin compile or whether it is an issue on the telco side. Below
is my config and
20 matches
Mail list logo
