Re: multiple bearer box - Netikos?

2003-02-25 Thread Kalle Marjola
on it right now, I hope that you can scavenge useful things out from it and this way improve the Kannel project. -- kalle marjola

Re: multiple bearer box ?

2003-02-20 Thread Kalle Marjola
(http library) The current Kannel is, however, made in that way that it gets trashed if it receives messages faster than it can handle, so beware :] -- kalle marjola

Re: smscconn cimd2

2003-02-06 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote: Kalle Marjola wrote: The attached patch changes cimd2 to use SMSCConn instead of old SMSCenter. However, notes: - diffed against latest CVS version (just did cvs udpate) - not tested! We do not have cimd2 currently available. Compiles, however

Re: Reloading configuration

2002-12-11 Thread Kalle Marjola
them entirely. But we can 'release' that code to be freely used by the Kannel project as it sees fit, apart from unicode part (distribution rights to that part are still owned by Wapit estate), if someone wants to start hacking. -- kalle marjola

Re: Kannel archtitecture

2002-10-31 Thread Kalle Marjola
tree, too. Some days have passed and so far I have received some comments about this; however, more feedback would be nice to have and especially on this list - what do you people think? -- kalle marjola

Kannel archtitecture

2002-10-08 Thread Kalle Marjola
won't announce the place here, so send me email) so investigate it and think about this issue. Feel free to say your opinion how easily some things can be ported to main Kannel tree, too. -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http://www.netikos.fi)

Re: Kannel archtitecture

2002-10-08 Thread Kalle Marjola
the possibility to publish it neverthless, but then the development in MatchEm was dropped (afaik). On the other hand, that Unicode code is quite simple, any good programmer would do it in a day or two, at least internal parts (not SMSC), the main work was in decising HOW to do it -- kalle marjola

smscconn cimd2

2002-09-24 Thread Kalle Marjola
of smsc_wrapper...) - includes some notes of various extra code which I couldn't include in the patch as then it would require patching of yet another big pile of files. However, if this can be merged, they might come next. -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http

Re: merging smsbox and bearerbox

2002-09-17 Thread Kalle Marjola
investigate how we can merge them into CVS tree and then provide patches. Hopefully as many as possible, but some might become difficult because of the above differences and limited time to do bigger modifications to make them work.. -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http

Re: [PATCH] AT2 rewrites (resubmit)

2002-08-21 Thread Kalle Marjola
so that tab is 8. If we change that, then all kind of cat, more, less, print etc. outputs of the source code get f*d up unless tab size of those is also modified to 8. Why can't you people just get an editor that auto-indents with spaces? :] -- kalle marjola NETikos finland (http

smsbox

2002-08-09 Thread Kalle Marjola
How many of you really use the feature of independent smsbox in different machine than the bearerbox? (or several smsboxes). Just thinking about the old 'thread smsbox' which was in old Kannel... -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http://www.netikos.fi)

Re: smsbox

2002-08-09 Thread Kalle Marjola
for that...) -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http://www.netikos.fi)

Re: smsbox

2002-08-09 Thread Kalle Marjola
like 1000-2000 msg/s of fixed answers in normal modern tabletop, like 500-1000 HTTP based services (if the server is fast enough) SMS centers usually do something between 10-50/s, java servlets less. Correct me if I'm horribly wrong -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http

Re: smsbox

2002-08-09 Thread Kalle Marjola
they cannot be removed and left to be application problem..) -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http://www.netikos.fi)

Re: smsbox

2002-08-09 Thread Kalle Marjola
at last remember: please do not send me double copies each time you reply to my emails. I'm on devel list, too, no need to send personal reply (hm, am I starting to sound like Lars?) -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http://www.netikos.fi)

Re: old smsc's and smsc_wrapper

2002-07-09 Thread Kalle Marjola
discarded rest. Has there been lots of changes to cimd2 recently? I havenät checked that version for some time, so there might be some updates needed. And I'm not guarenteening its behaviour, but so far no problems. -- kalle marjola

Re: Problem with SMPP smsc-password being too long

2002-07-08 Thread Kalle Marjola
as long as possible (and it is horror to debug panics ;) -- kalle marjola product concept manager NETikos finland (http://www.netikos.fi)

RE: Message store (Was: EMI: Serious Problem PANIC: Too manyconcurrentallocations)

2002-06-14 Thread Kalle Marjola
all messages ackked after the last write. -- kalle marjola

Re: Message store (Was: EMI: Serious Problem PANIC: Too manyconcurrent allocations)

2002-06-13 Thread Kalle Marjola
will grow in memory if messages do not get ackked, too. -- kalle marjola

Re: EMI: Serious Problem PANIC: Too many concurrent allocations

2002-06-03 Thread Kalle Marjola
. -- kalle marjola

Re: EMI: Serious Problem PANIC: Too many concurrent allocations

2002-05-24 Thread Kalle Marjola
=native should help. Hm, this question needs to be a s a first one in FAQ, it is so often asked.. (in fact I could not find it from FAQ section at all..) -- kalle marjola

RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.

2002-03-21 Thread Kalle Marjola
enough..) -- kalle marjola

Re: loadable modules ?

2002-02-22 Thread Kalle Marjola
with DLR's etc... Kannel is anyway faster than normal HTTP servers or SMS center connections.. and that protocol between bearerbox and smsbox is not that faster than HTTP protocol...) PS: Loadable modules: a great idea -- kalle marjola

RE: EMI2 fix for multi recipients

2001-11-14 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote: So when I use kannel I should make one http request per recipient? Yes, but see below. Has anybody tried to send messages to more than 10.000 recipients? How does it perform? I mean it does create a huge network overhead. If you have

RE: Incoming concatenation..

2001-10-26 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Anders Lindh wrote: Ok.. What would be required to implement the functionalty? Basically, I'd need to atleast get the contents of the messages. A strip-udh setting in kannel.conf could be implemented, this way the dirrent parts of long messages could be saved. Any

Re: AW: PANIC: Too many concurrent allocations

2001-10-25 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jörg Pommnitz wrote: It's either a bug in Kannel (memory leak) or a heavily stressed system running in debug limits. If it's not a memory leak, you can prevent the emergency shutdown by disabling debug malloc while calling configure. The checking malloc system can only

Re: [patch] Flash, MWI and Unicode

2001-07-23 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: but this way you have to have code to do the utf-8 encoding inside kannel. I don't know if it's easy or not. My patch only activates the unicode bit and pass the text in raw mode. This way, something outside kannel could encode the

RE: [RFC] mysql interface to kannel?

2001-07-23 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Paul Keogh wrote: - logging facility: access.log data may be stored to mysql db, especialy for automatic billing support. - configuration facility: multi-groups like sms-user, sms-service, ota-config may be stored in mysql db, so there may be added or manipulated

Re: CPU-usage

2001-07-04 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Frederik Ammitzbøll wrote: It's always the same thread (whether it's smsbox or bearerbox) that gets hungry. I believe it to be thread 1 (gwlib/fdset:poller) so that might be where the problem is. Any suggestions? Hm sounds like a problem in fd_set.. so gwlib is a good

Re: SMPP

2001-06-27 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Nisan wrote: Hi I was wondering why the SMPP interface (smsc_smpp.c) is not built around smsc.c and smsc_p.h? because smsc.c and smsc_p.h are depricated and should not be used by any SMSC module anymore - all new ones should be done by smscconn.h as stated in README