On Sonntag, Februar 16, 2003, at 04:31 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi All,
attached patch should solve the bug , make small cleanup and add additional sanity check...
please look in it and vote ...
ok, we had positive votes on this, so I'm commiting this.
AFAIS, Andreas
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi All,
attached patch should solve the bug , make small cleanup and add additional sanity
check...
please look in it and vote ...
ok, we had positive votes on this, so I'm commiting this.
AFAIS, Andreas was the only one with objections?! If he doesn't veto
the
Ok,
I'm a bit confused now.
What is the consensus of the discussion? I currently see only
Alexander's patch here. Any votes?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 13:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a
submission
report results in an out of bounds read.
Scenario:
The EMI driver checks for a DLR when a response is received for a submitted
message.
If there is a DLR requested for that message then the driver
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a
submission
report results in an out of bounds read.
Scenario:
The EMI driver checks for a DLR when a response is received for a submitted
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 13:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver
, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 14:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 03:22 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
Comments
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
Date: Montag, 3. Februar 2003 16:56
From: Alexander Malysh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
Michael you are right...
should we replace: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); with: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_create
, County Dublin, Ireland
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 14:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 03:22 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
Comments Below:
You're mixing up
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
Hi All,
Michael you are right...
should we replace: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); with:
dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_create();
?
Am Montag, 3. Februar 2003 16:38 schrieb Michael Mulcahy:
Hi All,
more information
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh (by
way of Alexander Malysh [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: 03 February 2003 15:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
Hi All,
Michael you are right...
should we
Hello!
this patch helps me:
--- smsc_emi2.c.origWed Nov 13 15:06:39 2002
+++ smsc_emi2.c Wed Nov 13 15:08:25 2002
@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ static int emi2_handle_smscreq (SMSCConn
* Recode the msg structure with the given msgdata.
* Note: the DLR URL is
13 matches
Mail list logo
