Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox can't send messages as fast
as they are delivered (probably due to a large burst and then sustained
high load). I see messages queued on the module's queue, and then it
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:02:38PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
Hmm. yes - I do compile using checking malloc. I re-comiled using native
malloc and it looks better - haven't had all the capacity testing done
on it yet though. Is it just that - checking malloc is so slow to cause
thrashing in code
Lately we've been doing some very high capacity testing on
Kannel , and
found out some interesting stuff. mainly as queues (managed by lists)
are filling up to over a few hundreds of messages, the boxes start
thrashing.
I think this is directly related to the List implementation -
it's
: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Hi Oded List
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
Lately we've been doing some very high capacity testing on
Kannel , and
found out some interesting stuff
life?
-- from Apocalypse Now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Keogh
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:37 PM
To: 'Kannel-devel (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Lately we've been doing some very
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox can't send messages as fast
as they are delivered (probably due to a large burst and then sustained
high load). I see messages queued on the module's queue, and then it
slows doesn the module more, so it can
Hi,
Hi,
Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox can't send messages as fast
as they are delivered (probably due to a large burst and then sustained
high load). I see messages queued on the module's queue, and then it
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Kalle Marjola
Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Hi,
Hi,
Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox
Cox
-Original Message-
From: Kalle Marjola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:40 PM
Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox can't
Hi list.
Lately we've been doing some very high capacity testing on Kannel , and
found out some interesting stuff. mainly as queues (managed by lists)
are filling up to over a few hundreds of messages, the boxes start
thrashing.
I think this is directly related to the List implementation - it's
PROTECTED]
Knebel's Law:
It is now proved beyond doubt that smoking is one of the leading causes
of statistics.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:26 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BUG] list
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Hi list.
Lately we've been doing some very high capacity testing on
Kannel , and
found out some interesting stuff. mainly as queues (managed by lists)
are filling up to over a few hundreds of messages
12 matches
Mail list logo
