RE: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-21 Thread Paul Keogh
This isn't Kannel's decision to make; this is data set by the end user's telephone, which may have requirements neither you nor I are (or could be) aware of. The analogy to a case-insensitive filesystem namespace is quite fitting if you think about it carefully. I did look at

RE: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-21 Thread Bruno David Rodrigues
Citando Paul Keogh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This isn't Kannel's decision to make; this is data set by the end user's telephone, which may have requirements neither you nor I are (or could be) aware of. The analogy to a case-insensitive filesystem namespace is quite fitting if

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
If it's DCS is really broken up in MO SMPP, then please re-send the patch. Use [PATCH] in the mail subject line. And try to explain in the mail what the problem was and what you patch does to fix it. Thanks in advance. I'm definetly willing to review it and vote. At least we can offer you that

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Dave White
Stipe Tolj wrote: If it's DCS is really broken up in MO SMPP, then please re-send the patch. Use [PATCH] in the mail subject line. The SMPP patch just fixes the following issues: *) Kannel coding param is overwritten with wrong values by pdu_to_msg (e.g. a Nokia business card, which is 8-bit

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Citando Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If it's DCS is really broken up in MO SMPP, then please re-send the patch. Use [PATCH] in the mail subject line. And try to explain in the mail what the problem was and what you patch does to fix it. Thanks in advance. I'm definetly willing to review

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Citando Dave White [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Say we have a binary (8-bit) message without compression, but with message class 1. These are pretty common; Nokia phones use these for most Smart Messaging MO's. There are two valid representations of this as a DCS octet: (WARNING -- try a

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Citando Dave White [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Say we have a binary (8-bit) message without compression, but with message class 1. These are pretty common; Nokia phones use these for most Smart Messaging MO's. There are two valid representations of this as a DCS octet: (WARNING -- try a

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Dave White
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Kannel should decide for the 0x0x spelling unless you pass alt-dcs field, which will select the 0xFx spelling. This isn't Kannel's decision to make; this is data set by the end user's telephone, which may have requirements neither you nor I are (or could be) aware of.

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Citando Dave White [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Kannel should decide for the 0x0x spelling unless you pass alt-dcs field, which will select the 0xFx spelling. This isn't Kannel's decision to make; this is data set by the end user's telephone, which may have

RE: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-18 Thread Angel Fradejas
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: It's not a Kannel decision, it's a kannel option did you understand the you can generate every valid dcs ? did you understand that third parties, which might not have a clue about dcs and like to just say mclass=1 for flash or coding=3text= for unicode accented chars?

Re: DCS and PID handling in Kannel

2003-02-17 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Citando Dave White [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The GSM data coding scheme (DCS) is broken up by Kannel into various seperate fields, as I've seen. The protocol id, however, is passed through as an opaque octet. Why is that? PID could concievably be treated the same way as DCS, and broken up into