Re: SMPP SMS-MO broken

2002-10-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Then in smpp_pdu_unpack we check for these. It wont allways work, it will depend on which other optional params are used by the SMSC. We almost need an array type in the def file to handle this properly. we have an SMPP v3.4 optional parameter patch running on our side here. As soon as I roll

Re: SMPP SMS-MO broken

2002-10-22 Thread Andreas Fink
On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 09:53 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: Then in smpp_pdu_unpack we check for these. It wont allways work, it will depend on which other optional params are used by the SMSC. We almost need an array type in the def file to handle this properly. we have an SMPP v3.4

RE: SMPP SMS-MO broken

2002-10-22 Thread Oded Arbel
-Original Message- From: Andreas Fink [mailto:andreas;fink.org] While we are at SMPP, in the SMPP code it does a gsm_to_latin1 conversion. This breaks Unicode SMS coming in and a unicode test message shows up as @T@E@S@T instead as of nullTnullEnullSnullT. Now whats the

Re: SMPP SMS-MO broken

2002-10-21 Thread Nisan Bloch
Hi At 09:23 AM 10/21/02 +0200, Andreas Fink wrote: yup - this is smpp 3.4. Your dump shows an optional parameter tag 04 24 which is the msg_payload parameter. We have a hack where I have added the following into smpp_pdu.def OPT_INTEGER(id_1, 2) OPT_INTEGER(len_1,2) OPT_OCTETS(data_1, len_1)