Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread jakob . gaardsted
Hi. This actually works, thank you ! (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of 'problem with receiving device' message). They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed because of a problem with falcom, or is it

RE: kannel to kannel connection

2001-10-03 Thread Jean-Jacques LOESCH
Hi all I've seen that it is possible to have the following configuration: app --- kannel SMSC: HTTP (type-Kannel) --- kannel --- SMSC: EMI2 ^client^server Is it possible to achieve this conf ? app --- kannel --- kannel (or other

RE: kannel to kannel connection

2001-10-03 Thread Andreas Fink
Hi all I've seen that it is possible to have the following configuration: app --- kannel SMSC: HTTP (type-Kannel) --- kannel --- SMSC: EMI2 ^client^server Is it possible to achieve this conf ? app --- kannel --- kannel (or

RE: kannel to kannel connection

2001-10-03 Thread Jean-Jacques LOESCH
Is it possible to achieve this conf ? app --- kannel --- kannel (or other WapGW) connectionless or connection oriented --- WAPSite My will is to achieve a WSP proxy like configuration with the kannel wap gw. I currently doing this with a big hack in 1.0.1 code but iwould like to know if

Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread Andrea Viscovich
Matt, I would like you to patch the at code and let at2 code from Andreas Fink. By the way maybe someone won't agree with this, but having an at3 is not so good. Anybody using at currently has any comments? Andrea

Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread Alexei
Why is it that bad to have at3 ? Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-03 Thread Stipe Tolj
Ok, if you got this problem then you most probably dont connect to a CMG SMSC but something emulating it or a CMG with an old release. The thing it does in this line is reading the timestamp information out which the SMSC gives back on a request. Apparently yours is empty or such. In my

Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread Matt Flax
On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote: Why is it that bad to have at3 ? Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. I am willing to test the new At

moving from 1.0.3 - 1.1.5

2001-10-03 Thread Robin Ericsson
Have anyone upgraded from 1.0.3 to 1.1.5? Interesting parts are CIMD2, EMI-IP (EMI2) and SMPP, changes, and stuff that can ruin the daily work for me :) -- Robin Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] NoName4Us AB While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery.