[BUG] smsbox

hi all, we are using Kannel 1.1.5 (no patches) and SMPP protocol and Red Hat Linux 7.1. in last 8 days, smsbox process disappear several times (not bearerbox). we check smsbox.log and foundsome panic message: 2001-10-01 01:08:35 [3] PANIC: mutex_unlock: Mutex

RE: Kannel 1.1.5 (SMPP) to SMSC-SEMA

Hi, The version of SMPP in kannel is 3.4. The SEMA SMPP implementation checks the version and if it is 3.4 the SEMA implementation stores the message contents in the message payload field. This is why the sm_length is set to 0 as required by the SMPP specification. The message payload paramter

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

Bi Bruno, do you get the panic even if you don't specify the dlr_* in http push ? yes, even for normal cgi-bin/sendsms this happens. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel:

RE: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

Did you check if the problem still occurs when you comment fakesmsc group entries ? I noticed that bearerbox crashes with cgi-bin/status on Redhat 6.2 with the last CVS version abd only when you add fakesmsc group. PS : I am using emi2 SMSC only -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL

weird CR / LF behaviour on falcom a2d1 modem

Hi. I'm using a falcom A2d1 modem with recent CVS kannel (sep28), and have noticed the following weird behaviour: LF (0xa) and CR (0xd) becomes switched around !!? When I send an SMS with CR out through kannel, my normal phone gets an LF. And vice versa. This does NOT happen, when I use

BUG in emi2 (was Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?)

Hi all, Did you check if the problem still occurs when you comment fakesmsc group entries ? I noticed that bearerbox crashes with cgi-bin/status on Redhat 6.2 with the last CVS version abd only when you add fakesmsc group. There is no fakesmsc group in the config file. There is definitly

[Patch] Emi2 not sending timestamp on ACK

It's now on CVS a patch to support ACK without timestamp. Please note that Delivery Reports wouldn't work without that timestamp, so http fields are irrelevant. -- Bruno David Rodrigues BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Rodrigues;Bruno David Simões FN:Bruno David Simões Rodrigues ORG:Vodafone

Re: [BUG] smsbox

hi Ian, thanks for your reply. i do log in debug mode. 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: HTTP: Sending request: 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x808eb18: 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: len: 76 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: size: 77 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG:

Re: [Patch] Emi2 not sending timestamp on ACK

It's now on CVS a patch to support ACK without timestamp. I'll try that one and report. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL

Re: CVS patches

I'm now looking at your code. You are forcing receiving sms's through ME memory, right ? What about if some mobile doesn't work correctly with it ? quote(SMSs go through memory - this is reliable, but only implemented and + tested on an Ericsson gm25 modem and falcom */) can should create a

Re: Throughput

Usually (at least with UCP), it's the smsc that limits you by delaying the ACK for a certain amount of time, so you don't have to worry about that. But if UCP SMSC is configured to use windowed-mode, I (or someone) would have to make a patch to smsc_emi2 to define the window to use. If it's

RE: CVS patches

I'm now looking at your code. You are forcing receiving sms's through ME memory, right ? What about if some mobile doesn't work correctly with it ? quote(SMSs go through memory - this is reliable, but only implemented and + tested on an Ericsson gm25 modem and falcom */) can should

Re: CVS patches

I thought of not auto-detecting so I can force the old behaviour or force a ME or SIM usage (someone told about a limit of read/writes in SIM memory). Of course the code could auto-detect that if I try to force ME and mobile doesn't support ME memory, kannel should use other mode. -- Bruno

Re: Throughput

Usually (at least with UCP), it's the smsc that limits you by delaying the ACK for a certain amount of time, so you don't have to worry about that. But if UCP SMSC is configured to use windowed-mode, I (or someone) would have to make a patch to smsc_emi2 to define the window to use. If it's

Re: Throughput

Are you sure that smsc aren't in stop-and-wait mode and you are in windowed mode ? If that's the case, you could be loosing messages, like send msg 01 send msg 02 send msg 03 receive ack 01 send msg 04 send msg 05 send msg 06 receive ack 04 ... message 02,03, 05 and 06 were missed because smsc

Re: Throughput

Are you sure that smsc aren't in stop-and-wait mode and you are in windowed mode ? Yes. I'm sure. If that's the case, you could be loosing messages, like send msg 01 send msg 02 send msg 03 receive ack 01 send msg 04 send msg 05 send msg 06 receive ack 04 ... message 02,03, 05 and 06 were

RE: [BUG] smsbox

2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: HTTP: Sending request: 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x808eb18: 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: len: 76 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: size: 77 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: data: 47 45 54

Strange non-running state

When I download and compile the latest CVS, it runs only the run-bearer and run-smsbox binaries, and not the bearerbox or smsboxes. No logs are generated or touched. The run-bearer and run-smsbox stay up forever, apparently doing nothing. And I don't know how to see why, short of running a

Re: Throughput

That's not bad, that's the way EMI protocol works. And yes, kannel retries the message but once again, the only messages that will pass are the ones sent after the last ACK/NACK. -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bind to ip?

Soon. I've commited now a patch with preliminary code to do that. Now we have to check in where (or which services) would we want to bind to a ip. I know I want to bind bearebox-smsbox to localhost only and I have a smsc connection that I want to bind to a IP that is an alias (and linux insists

Re: Strange non-running state

can you run bearerbox -v 0 path/kannel.conf and smsbox by hand ? -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: Steve Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 7:07 PM Subject: Strange non-running state When I download and compile the

Re: HTTP Basic authentication doesn't work with sms-service

Ok, now the code replaces it back to colon and replaces password with * chars. -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: Bruno David Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gildas PERROT [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Devel@Kannel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:37 PM

[RFC] Splitting sms messages

Once we've talked about moving sms_split code to smsc code because it's smsc code that would encode the message (for example to gsm alphabet) and only then we know the size of the message Reference: a message with special characters - example lots of { would get droped by emi2 if splitted. But

Re: [RFC] Splitting sms messages

Once we've talked about moving sms_split code to smsc code because it's smsc code that would encode the message (for example to gsm alphabet) and only then we know the size of the message Reference: a message with special characters - example lots of { would get droped by emi2 if splitted. But

Re: [RFC] Splitting sms messages

but what about if the charset used by the smsc is different ? we cannot assume that it will be the default gsm alphabet as was told here. -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:28 PM

Re: [RFC] Splitting sms messages

I remember one smsc that eats IA5 chars and internally converts to gsm alphabet (I remember it because I couldn't use my fields_to_dcs in it) -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:39

[Patch] http basic authentication, at2 eating cpu and patch to my latest patch

2001-10-08 Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] * gwlib/http.c: When url was like http://user:pass@site, the first colon was changed to @ to differentiate from the colon for port number. Now the code replaces it back to colon and replaces password with *.

Re: CVS patches

Hi Bruno, On 8 October 2001, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: I'm now looking at your code. You are forcing receiving sms's through ME memory, right ? No the code uses SM memory and defaults to that. All mobiles have SM memory. There is the option of using ME memory for phones which have it.

Re: CVS patches

Hi Paul, On 8 October 2001, Paul Keogh wrote: I'm now looking at your code. You are forcing receiving sms's through ME memory, right ? What about if some mobile doesn't work correctly with it ? quote(SMSs go through memory - this is reliable, but only implemented and + tested on

Re: CVS patches

comments included: -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: Matt Flax [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bruno David Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:09 AM Subject: Re: CVS patches Hi Bruno, On 8 October 2001, Bruno David

Re: [BUG] smsbox

hi, Ian, does smsbox quit when she get error? we have got 100,000 msg in last 8 days and met the error only several times.so we think the url is correct.we think the key was : 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] PANIC: mutex_unlock: Mutex failure! 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] PANIC: System

[Patch] emi2 and sockets

2001-10-08 Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] * gw/smsc_emi2.c, gwlib/cfg.def: Added throughput (messages per second) variable to configuration. Delays 1/throughtput seconds between sending messages. * gw/smsc_emi2.c, gwlib/cfg.def: Added window configuration that