Hi list, Hi Aarno,
I'm wondering how we can do something like this: (has been discussed
already)
...
group = ppg
...
default-smsc-id = foo # the default smsc-id to use in bearerbox
this is pretty easy, but what about this:
...
grou = wap-push-user
...
smsc-id = foo # user
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a
submission
report results in an out of bounds read.
Scenario:
The EMI driver checks for a DLR when a response is received for a submitted
message.
If there is a DLR requested for that message then the driver
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a
submission
report results in an out of bounds read.
Scenario:
The EMI driver checks for a DLR when a response is received for a submitted
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 12:52 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list, Hi Aarno,
I'm wondering how we can do something like this: (has been discussed
already)
...
group = ppg
...
default-smsc-id = foo> # the default smsc-id to use in bearerbox
this is pretty easy, but what about this:
...
Hi Stipe List,
PPG keeps push users list for authentication purposes. This list would
contain all other user
specific information, too. Authentication module should return this
data to pap_request_thread.
Aarno
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:52 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list, Hi Aarno,
Hi All,
Comments Below:
You're mixing up the SMSC response with the delivery report.
When you send a message, you send a type 51 message. you will
get a 50ACK back saying the SMSC has accepted the SMS.
Is this a typo on your part? According to the EMI spec 4.0 the response to
the submit
Hi All,
more information for your understanding:
When I submit a message with a dlr mask of 24, the bearerbox crashes,
Used following sendsms request:
http://127.0.0.1:22022/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testuserpassword=passwordt
o=12345676from=987654321text=Test Message (A) is being
Andreas Fink wrote:
I think both variants make sense. I would actually recommend the following approach:
a) if smsc=... is set on the push, use it otherwhise use the one defined in
group=ppg
b) if group wap-push user has a default-smsc-id, use it if smsc=.. is not set by
step a)
c) if
- Original Message -
From: Dariusz Markowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:29 PM
Subject: [PATCH] bug in urltrans.c
Hi list,
This patch solves smsbox crash problem in urltrans_get_pattern() (urltrans.c).
Not every SMSC (i.e. CIMD2 and
Dear Andy,
Sunday, February 2, 2003, 11:21:37 PM, you wrote:
AEJ Oleg Titov wrote:
Hello Kannel list,
I was looking for kannel-*.rpm package and was unable to find it.
AEJ I think there was an rpm version with kannel-1.2.0 as the current stable
AEJ version.
I was unable to find it on
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
Date: Montag, 3. Februar 2003 16:56
From: Alexander Malysh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
Michael you are right...
should we replace: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); with: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_create();
?
Hi all,
Included is a patch that allows shortnumbers to be printed on the
receivers phone without prepending the pluss sign. This also make it
easy for the receiver to reply directly to the message. This can be very
convenient in services for chat, games, dating etc.
I have added a parameter
Hi All,
Michael you are right...
should we replace: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); with: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_create();
?
Am Montag, 3. Februar 2003 16:38 schrieb Michael Mulcahy:
Hi All,
more information for your understanding:
When I submit a
Michael you are right...
should we replace: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); with:
dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
octstr_create();
?
I think so, unless other people working with EMI have a better idea!
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com
This patch solves smsbox crash problem in
urltrans_get_pattern() (urltrans.c).
Not every SMSC (i.e. CIMD2 and OISD) return additional text message
in DLR. So, when this text is NULL smsbox will crash.
Best regards,
Dariusz Markowicz
+1 for this - octstr_split_words() cannot be passed
Hi All,
attached patch should solve the bug , make small cleanup and add additional sanity
check...
please look in it and vote ...
Am Montag, 3. Februar 2003 19:08 schrieb Michael Mulcahy:
Michael you are right...
should we replace: dlrmsg-sms.msgdata =
Thanks Bruno,
I did a cvs diff across 1.2.1 vs 1.3.0 to find ...
./.cvsignore
5,6d4
config.guess
config.sub
9,11d6
diff
diff2
build-stamp
looks like someone has removed the config.sub and config.guess files
from cvs repository - these are required as part of the build process. [
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 06:40 Uhr, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
Hi all,
Included is a patch that allows shortnumbers to be printed on the receivers phone without prepending the pluss sign. This also make it easy for the receiver to reply directly to the message. This can be very convenient in
Hello!
this patch helps me:
--- smsc_emi2.c.origWed Nov 13 15:06:39 2002
+++ smsc_emi2.c Wed Nov 13 15:08:25 2002
@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ static int emi2_handle_smscreq (SMSCConn
* Recode the msg structure with the given msgdata.
* Note: the DLR URL is
Hi,
I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to ask,
should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the number
of the sender? and if so, what is the difference between 'shortnumber' and
'from' number? because, for example, SMPP (if operator permits) allows
20 matches
Mail list logo
