Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

Hi Alexander, ok, I tried to understand the patch. Here is what I sum up: Within gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_receiver() you create a msg of type ack and fill it with values depending on the result of the smsc2_rout() call. ok so far ok. Then you inject the ack msg to conn-incoming. But I don't see any

Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

Hi Stipe, On Sunday 17 November 2002 15:05, you wrote: Hi Alexander, ok, I tried to understand the patch. Here is what I sum up: Within gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_receiver() you create a msg of type ack and fill it with values depending on the result of the smsc2_rout() call. ok so far ok. you are

Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

please re submit this patch as a unified diff, and ignoring changes to white space. This is horrid to read as there are many lines in the diff that are not necessary. yep, Nisan is right here. The more cleanly your patch is, the faster we may review it and vote for commitment to cvs. Stipe

[PATCH] Avoid bearerbox oom-kill!

Hi List, here is a small patch to avoid bearerbox oom-kill and give smsbox really status of sms. OOM-Kill simple scenario: your bearerbox is connected to SMSC but connection is broken (temporarely). So smsbox send sms to bearerbox (bbbox) and bbbox store it in queue (list) and sometimes is bbbox

Re: [PATCH] Avoid bearerbox oom-kill!

here is a small patch to avoid bearerbox oom-kill and give smsbox really status of sms. OOM-Kill simple scenario: your bearerbox is connected to SMSC but connection is broken (temporarely). So smsbox send sms to bearerbox (bbbox) and bbbox store it in queue (list) and sometimes is bbbox too

[PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

Hi, this is the same oom-kill patch with memleak bugfix. -- Mit besten Grüßen aus Köln Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___ Centrium GmbH Ehrenstraße 2 50672 Köln Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 150 Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web:

Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

Hi please re submit this patch as a unified diff, and ignoring changes to white space. This is horrid to read as there are many lines in the diff that are not necessary. nisan At 06:49 PM 11/15/02 +0100, Alexander Malysh wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15

Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (resend)

Hi, Am Freitag, 15. November 2002 19:00 schrieb Nisan Bloch: Hi please re submit this patch as a unified diff, and ignoring changes to white space. This is horrid to read as there are many lines in the diff that are not necessary. sorry for this ;) here is it ... nisan At 06:49 PM