Re: patching dlr_sdb for same smsc all the time

2003-09-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: Will this work? why not try?! ;) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet:

Re: dlr_sdb bug

2003-09-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: Another note is that some people may wish to keep a record of their dlrs and not have them deleted by default. I patched dlr.c to call update on delete rather than delete, which meant that the dlr status is recorded in the dlr table. hmmm, we didn't intend this

Re: Connection failed ?

2003-09-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
An SMS is sent from a user's mobile phone to kannel. Kannel identifies the specific service, and a URL is requested via the GET-method. Kannel expects the response from the URL, BUT, the connection between kannel and HTTP Server is lost, BEFORE kannel receives the response SMS, that is

RE: Connection failed ?

2003-09-19 Thread Stamatopoulos Panagiotis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Stipe, Thanks for the response, BUT this is not exactly what I am asking for. I already implemented the scenario you describe (could not fetch). In my scenario the HTTP request is delivered to the HTTP server, BUT BEFORE the HTTP server delivers the expected response to kannel, the connection

Re: dlr_sdb bug

2003-09-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
that was a reason why I added sdb_get_limit_str(), so if db support another limit clause (as oracle ROWNUM) then you can just add it there... Using libsdb is anyway a bad idea, because libsdb doesn't support persistent db connections. And from my experience, I know that opening a db connection

catenate the ff fe prefix in UTF-16 encoded octstr and swapping bytes in words (if it tnecessary)

2003-09-19 Thread Yury Mikhienko
Hi developers! I use kannel as SMSGW on the SPARC (with SunOS) platform and I was oblige to implement the following futures in some functions :)) in gwlib/octstr.c void octstr_swap_bytes(Octstr *ostr) { unsigned char ch = 0; long pos; seems_valid(ostr); for(pos = 0;pos ostr-len -

WTP Session

2003-09-19 Thread Marco Fassiotto
Hello, during my wandering in the kannel code I've noticed that the function wtp_event_is_for_responder differentiates whether to dispatch an incoming datagram to the WTP initiator or responder based on the TID value (if TID 0x8000 to responder else to initiator). I have not found mention to

Re: Connection failed ?

2003-09-19 Thread Andreas Fink
On Freitag, September 19, 2003, at 11:22 Uhr, Stamatopoulos Panagiotis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Stipe, Thanks for the response, BUT this is not exactly what I am asking for. I already implemented the scenario you describe (could not fetch). In my scenario the HTTP request is delivered to the

AW: WTP Session

2003-09-19 Thread Jörg Pommnitz
Page 29, of WAP-224-WTP-20010710-a, Version 10-Jul-2001 7.6. Asynchronous Transactions 7.6.1. Motivation The maximum number of outstanding transactions at any moment is limited by the maximum number of Transaction Identifiers. The Transaction Identifier is 16 bits, but the high order bit is

RE: Connection failed ?

2003-09-19 Thread Stamatopoulos Panagiotis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The issue is not who brings the connection down. We suppose that it's not a proxy nor a firewall problem and the configuration is correct.Let's just say that is a cable problem. All I am asking is if kannel can handle this situation. -Original Message- From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL

Fw: Re: catenate the ff fe prefix in UTF-16 encoded octstr and swapping bytes in words (if it tnecessary)

2003-09-19 Thread Yury Mikhienko
Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:37:50 +0400 From: Yury Mikhienko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: catenate the ff fe prefix in UTF-16 encoded octstr and swapping bytes in words (if it tnecessary) Hi Andreas! I anticipate the wery

Re: Fw: Re: catenate the ff fe prefix in UTF-16 encoded octstr and swapping bytes in words (if it tnecessary)

2003-09-19 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, On Friday 19 September 2003 16:07, Yury Mikhienko wrote: [snip] in this case - yes, but now I modify my code to: if (msg-sms.coding == DC_UCS2) { /* * remove the first two bytes FE FF from octetstring (add from yuryx for SMSCv3.2) * */ Octstr *octstr_tmp =