backtrace can't show the name of the file

who has used backtrace function? I test it on Redhat 7.0 gcc version is 2.95.3. When panic, backtrace just show hex address and can't see any file name? LDflag -rdynamic has passed to GCC. what's the problem? thanks zhu Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

Re: backtrace can't show the name of the file

Hi, first: please don't mix threads! try to add '-g' flag as well... zhu shi song wrote: who has used backtrace function? I test it on Redhat 7.0 gcc version is 2.95.3. When panic, backtrace just show hex address and can't see any file name? LD flag -rdynamic has passed to GCC. what's

Re: [ANN|RFC] Kannel 1.3.2rc1 devel tarball available

torsdag 8. juli 2004, 19:23, skrev Stipe Tolj: Hi list, I have finished summarizing the changes from 1.3.1 devel to 1.3.2 devel into the NEWS file, tagged the cvs head with tag 'version_1_3_2rc1' and made the rc1 tarball for 1.3.2 devel available via

Re: [ANN|RFC] Kannel 1.3.2rc1 devel tarball available

Hi Stipe, +1 from me. I did only simulation tests... Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi list, I have finished summarizing the changes from 1.3.1 devel to 1.3.2 devel into the NEWS file, tagged the cvs head with tag 'version_1_3_2rc1' and made the rc1 tarball for 1.3.2 devel available via

Re: [ANN|RFC] Kannel 1.3.2rc1 devel tarball available

ok, looks good. I'll need to resolve at least the last bug report with %P url escape code and try to reproduce. If this is reproducable, we'll need to fix before we roll the tarball. There is also an issue with quotes within parameters values of WSP headers. Aiming to roll the tarball today.